PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Clinical & Translational Oncology3 citationsOpen Access

Is mortality truly higher for oncology patients admitted to intensive care units? A matched cohort observational study

MPMarta Zafra PovesMCM.A. Vicente ConesaMGMaría Esperanza Guirao García

Key Result

In critically ill adults matched for illness severity and comorbidity, a diagnosis of solid tumor did not significantly increase ICU mortality compared to non-cancer patients (27.5% vs 19.8%).

Key Points

  • This study aims to determine if cancer patients have higher mortality rates in intensive care units compared to non-cancer patients.
  • Retrospective analysis of 167 cancer patients admitted to ICU from 2010 to 2016.
  • Matched cancer patients with two non-cancer cohorts based on age, sex, and do-not-intubate orders.
  • Additional matching for severity using SOFA score, SAPS II, and Charlson Comorbidity Index.
  • Cancer patients showed higher ICU mortality rates than controls when matched for demographics (27.5% vs 10.8%).
  • When accounting for severity and comorbidity, mortality rates between groups were similar (27.5% vs 19.8%).
  • 90-day survival was significantly lower for cancer patients overall (64.7% vs 80.2%), but not when severity matched (64.7% vs 71.3%).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=501)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does a solid tumor diagnosis increase mortality in patients emergently admitted to the ICU compared to matched non-cancer controls?

P
Population
167 consecutive adults (≥ 18 years) with solid tumors emergently admitted to a mixed ICU for medical or urgent surgical reasons. Median age 64, 67.7% male. 54% had metastatic disease, 41% acute respiratory failure, and 28.7% sepsis/shock.
I
Intervention
Emergent ICU admission for acute critical illness in patients with solid tumors
C
Comparator
Two 1:1 propensity-matched non-cancer cohorts admitted to the same ICU: (1) matched for age, sex, and do-not-intubate order; (2) matched additionally for admission diagnosis, maximum SOFA, SAPS II, and Charlson Comorbidity Index
O
Outcome
ICU mortalityhard clinical

Critically ill patients with solid tumors have similar ICU and hospital mortality to non-cancer patients when matched for illness severity and comorbidity, suggesting cancer diagnosis alone should not preclude ICU admission.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 27.5% vs 19.8%

p-value: p=0.094

Limitations

  • Single-center and retrospective nature
  • No data on oncology patients who were evaluated but ultimately denied ICU admission
  • Cohort combines heterogeneous solid tumor types with different prognoses
  • Admissions from 2010-2016 may not fully represent current practice with immunotherapy and targeted therapies
  • Functional and quality of life outcomes after discharge from the ICU were not reported
  • No data on oncology patients who were evaluated but ultimately denied ICU admission (selection bias)
  • Combines heterogeneous solid tumor types with different prognoses
  • Data from 2010-2016 may not reflect current immunotherapy and targeted therapies
  • Model of care with 24/7 in-house oncologists is not universal

Abstract

Abstract Background Cancer patients often develop life-threatening events that prompt intensive care unit (ICU) admission. However, uncertainty regarding prognosis may hinder timely referral. We compared ICU survival in adults with solid tumors admitted emergently for medical or urgent surgical reasons with that of non-cancer controls. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 167 consecutive adults with solid tumors emergently admitted to a mixed ICU in a single center between 2010 and 2016, and compared them with two propensity-matched non-cancer cohorts. We made two 1:1 comparisons: (1) cancer and non-cancer patients matched for age, sex and do-not-intubate order; (2) the same cancer cohort matched additionally for admission diagnosis, maximum SOFA, SAPS II and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Primary outcome was ICU mortality; hospital mortality and 90-day survival were secondary endpoints. Results Cancer cases represented 4.8% of all ICU admissions; 54% had metastatic disease, 41% acute respiratory failure, and 28.7% sepsis/shock. When matched only for demographic and functional factors, cancer patients had higher intensive care unit and hospital mortality rates than controls (27.5% vs 10.8%, p < 0.001, and 35.3% vs 16.2%, p < 0.001, respectively). After matching for severity and comorbidity, ICU and hospital mortality no longer differed significantly (27.5% vs 19.8%; p = 0.094, and 35.3% vs 28.7%; p = 0.4). 90-day survival was significantly lower for cancer patients (64.7% vs 80.2%, p < 0.001), but no differences were found with controls matched for severity and comorbidity (64.7% vs 71.3%, p = 0.4). Conclusions Solid-tumor patients admitted to the ICU are generally more severely ill and thus present higher crude mortality than non-cancer patients. However, when severity and comorbidity are equivalent, outcomes are similar. Therefore, intensive care should be offered to cancer patients with reversible critical illness and acceptable baseline status, and a cancer diagnosis alone should not be considered a contraindication for ICU admission.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Poves et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Solid tumors requiring emergent ICU admission (n=501). Solid tumor diagnosis vs. Non-cancer patients matched for age, sex, DNI order, admission diagnosis, maximum SOFA, SAPS II, and Charlson Comorbidity Index was evaluated on ICU mortality (p=0.094). In critically ill adults matched for illness severity and comorbidity, a diagnosis of solid tumor did not significantly increase ICU mortality compared to non-cancer patients (27.5% vs 19.8%).

synapsesocial.com/papers/69843422f1d9ada3c1fb1fdahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-026-04224-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper