PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery Online Case Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Inverted piggyback intraocular lens insertion complicated by acute angle closure

View Full Paper
BGBenjamin GriffinKMKareem MahgoubASAnna-Maria Sideri

Key Points

  • This research investigates the complications of inverted piggyback intraocular lens implantation and its link to acute angle-closure glaucoma.
  • Examined two cases of women experiencing symptoms after Sulcoflex piggyback IOL implantation.
  • Conducted clinical examinations including optical coherence tomography to assess IOL orientation.
  • Applied acute management measures such as antiglaucoma therapy and Nd:YAG laser iridotomy.
  • Both patients presented with acute ocular pain, blurred vision, and high intraocular pressure.
  • Inverted IOL positioning led to pupillary block and variable clinical outcomes dependent on timely intervention.
  • Delayed recognition resulted in advanced glaucoma and corneal decompensation, while early intervention restored vision.

Abstract

Introduction: Inverted implantation of the Sulcoflex piggyback intraocular lens (IOL) is a rare clinical scenario. These cases demonstrate a previously unreported mechanism of acute angle-closure glaucoma caused by pupillary block in pseudophakic patients without optic capture. Patient and Clinical Findings: 2 women presented with acute ocular pain, blurred vision, and markedly elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) after Sulcoflex piggyback IOL implantation to correct postoperative refractive surprise. Clinical examination revealed shallow anterior chambers, corneal edema, and unexpected concavity of the piggyback IOL anterior surface. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography confirmed inverted piggyback IOL orientation in both cases. Diagnosis, Intervention, and Outcomes: Pupillary block due to inverted IOL positioning was diagnosed in both patients. Acute management included systemic and topical antiglaucoma therapy and Nd:YAG laser peripheral iridotomy. Subsequent lens removal with viscogoniosynechiolysis was performed in one case, while IOL repositioning was performed in the other. Clinical outcomes differed–delayed recognition in one case led to advanced secondary glaucoma and corneal decompensation, while early recognition in the other allowed restoration of vision with normal IOP. Conclusions: Inverted Sulcoflex piggyback IOL implantation can lead to acute angle closure in the absence of optic capture. Early recognition and intervention are essential to prevent irreversible complications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Griffin et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6984346ff1d9ada3c1fb2864https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcro.0000000000000207
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper