PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research3 citationsOpen Access

Evaluating RayCloudTools to estimate single-tree volume

View Full Paper
BWBenjamin WildTÖTaşkın ÖzkanMAMoonis Ali

Key Points

  • This research assesses the efficacy of RayCloudTools' QSM for estimating single-tree volume.
  • Comparative evaluation of RCT-QSM against datasets of TLS scans and destructive measurements
  • Comparison with four existing QSM methods: AdTree, TreeQSM, AdQSM, SimpleForest
  • Sensitivity analysis using 1860 systematically downsampled point clouds
  • Application tested on two experimental plots scanned with TLS and UAV-based laser scanning.
  • High correspondence between RCT-QSM and destructively harvested volumes (CCC = 0.95)
  • Moderate negative bias of RCT-QSM (-7.3%) with NRMSE of 5%
  • RCT-QSM outperforms other QSM methods, though differences with TreeQSM are minor
  • Stable accuracy for point densities as low as one per 10x10x10 cm voxel.

Abstract

Abstract Above-Ground Forest Biomass (AGB) is vital for understanding the carbon cycle, for carbon accounting, and for climate projections. Single-tree AGB measurements or precise estimates are crucial for calibrating and validating remote sensing based AGB mapping (e.g. in the area-based approaches), but remain costly and challenging to acquire. The recently introduced open-source RayCloudTools (RCT) software includes an efficient QSM (Quantitative Structure Model) solution, RCT-QSM that uses Dijkstra’s algorithm to segment and volumetrically reconstruct trees, providing tree volume, which further requires density to obtain mass. The accuracy and practicability of RCT-QSM, however, have remained largely unassessed. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of RCT-QSM, by comparing its volume estimates against: (i) three publicly available datasets of temporally coinciding TLS (Terrestrial Laser Scanning) scans and destructive measurements, (ii) four existing QSM methods (AdTree, TreeQSM, AdQSM, and SimpleForest), and (iii) allometric model outputs from two experimental plots in Austria, where point clouds were obtained with terrestrial and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based laser scanning. The comparison with destructively acquired single-tree data (n = 124) from three publicly available datasets shows an overall high correspondence between RCT-QSM derived volumes and destructively harvested volumes (CCC = 0.95) with a moderate negative bias (−7.3%) and an NRMSE of 5%. RCT-QSM outperforms other existing QSM solutions, such as AdTree, AdQSM, SimpleForest, and TreeQSM. TreeQSM metrics, however, show only small differences compared to RCT-QSM. An extensive point density sensitivity analysis featuring 1860 systematically downsampled point clouds from the same dataset demonstrates RCT-QSM’s high robustness to variations in point density. Accuracy and completeness of the results remain stable for point densities as low as one point per 10x10x10 cm voxel. Regarding the large-scale applicability, RCT-QSM provides reliable results for two experimental plots in Austria, which were scanned with TLS and UAV-LS, respectively. RCT-QSM efficiently derives single-tree volume, aligning well with allometric models, demonstrating its applicability across various data acquisition settings and forest conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wild et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698434a6f1d9ada3c1fb2ff9https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpaf087
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Reducing tree volume overestimation in quantitative structure models using modeled branch topology and direct twig measurements2024 · 19 citations
  2. 2Non-destructive Aboveground Biomass Estimation in Teak Plantations: Validating Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Quantitative Structure Models against Destructive Sampling2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Non-Destructive Estimation of Deciduous Forest Metrics: Comparisons between UAV-LiDAR, UAV-DAP, and Terrestrial LiDAR Leaf-Off Point Clouds Using Two QSMs2024 · 4 citations
  4. 4A Unified Graph-based Framework for Scalable 3D Tree Reconstruction and Non-Destructive Biomass Estimation from Point Clouds2025
  5. 5Advancing Forest Inventory in Tropical Rainforests: A Multi-Source LiDAR Approach for Accurate 3D Tree Modeling and Volume Estimation2025 · 5 citations