PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 20260 citations

STEM challenges in assessment scale: A content validity study for prospective teachers’ readiness in sustainable STEM education

View Full Paper
YSYurizka Melia SariYMYuli Izza El MillaSFShofan Fiangga

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the content validity of the STEM Challenges in Assessment Scale (SCiAS) for prospective teachers.
  • Developed the SCiAS instrument focusing on planning, implementation, and STEM integration challenges.
  • Conducted content validation with input from three STEM education experts.
  • Calculated the Item-Content Validity Index (I-CVI) for 26 items, revising two based on expert feedback.
  • 22 out of 26 items achieved a perfect I-CVI score.
  • The Scale-Content Validity Index (S-CVI/Ave) score of 0.92 demonstrates high validity.
  • Experts indicated the instrument's significance in bridging the gap between STEM assessment theory and actual practice.

Abstract

Developing STEM-based assessments for prospective mathematics teachers the requires systematic identification of challenges, especially in planning, implementation, and STEM integration. Previous studies have shown the lack of instruments to map these barriers holistically, especially in Indonesia. This study aims to test the content validity of the STEM Challenges in Assessment Scale (SCiAS) instrument as a measurement tool for prospective teachers’ challenges in four indicators: assessment planning, assessment implementation, valid and reliable assessment, and STEM assessment integration. Content validation was conducted involving three experts in STEM education and learning evaluation. 22 out of 26 items achieved a perfect Item-Content Validity Index (I-CVI) score. Two items (I-CVI 0.67) were revised based on qualitative feedback to clarify the context of multidisciplinary integration and technology access challenges. The Scale-Content Validity Index (S-CVI/Ave) score of 0.92 confirms the instrument meets high validity standards. Experts emphasised the importance of this instrument in measuring the gap between STEM assessment theory and practice. The instrument validates teacher candidates’ challenges in four critical indicators of STEM assessment. This instrument can be the basis for developing teacher training to improve competencies in planning, implementing, and integrating valid assessments. Its implementation will support sustainable quality education through holistic STEM assessment practices.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sari et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698434b4f1d9ada3c1fb31cdhttps://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564002008/pdf
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper