PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Environments1 citationsOpen Access

Effect of Foreign Direct Investment on Environmental Sustainability in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Panel EGLS Cross-Section SUR with PCSE Approach

View Full Paper
DWDaniel WirekoPMPatricia Lindelwa Makoni

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess how foreign direct investment affects environmental sustainability in Sub-Saharan Africa.
  • Analyzed data from 47 Sub-Saharan African countries between 1990 and 2022.
  • Applied panel-estimated generalized least squares (EGLS) and seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) methods.
  • Utilized autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) strategy for long-run co-integration testing.
  • Employed fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) for robustness analysis.
  • FDI inflows generally worsen environmental sustainability indicators.
  • FDI contributes to increased carbon dioxide emissions.
  • FDI also leads to the depletion of natural and forest resources.
  • The negative impact of FDI on CO2 emissions is primarily observed in the short run.

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows on environmental sustainability in 47 Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries from 1990 to 2022. This study applies panel-estimated generalised least squares (EGLS) cross-section and seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) with panel-corrected standard error (PCSE) to estimate the data. The dynamic panel pooled mean group (PMG) of the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) strategy was used to test the presence of long-run co-integrating relationships among the variables, whereas the dynamic panel fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) was used for robustness analysis. Empirical findings show that FDI inflows exacerbate environmental devastation regardless of the indicator used for environmental sustainability. This study notes that FDI propels carbon dioxide emissions, while also contributing to the depletion of both natural and forest resources. However, FDI’s CO2 emissions-enhancing impact is restricted to the short-run period, similar to its effect on natural resource depletion. The study recommends that environmental regulating agencies in SSA host countries should strictly enforce environmental laws to ensure FDI investors’ compliance. This study further suggests the harmonisation of FDI policies, the integration of operational codes of practice, and the realignment of environmental regulations and laws in all SSA economies to ensure that no one country becomes a favourable destination for FDI investors relative to others.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wireko et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698434dff1d9ada3c1fb383dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/environments13020081
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Do environmental regulations moderate the impact of FDI on emissions in Sub-Saharan Africa?2026
  2. 2Foreign Direct Investment and CO2 Emissions in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Heterogeneous Panel Causality Analysis2024
  3. 3Investing in the Future: Clean Energy, Technological Advancement, and Environmental Quality as Catalysts for Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from SSA2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4A dynamic panel analysis of foreign direct investment and inclusive green growth in Sub Saharan Africa2026
  5. 5Achieving sustainability: Unravelling the role of financial development and foreign direct investment in sub‐Saharan Africa2024 · 12 citations