PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Journal for STEM Education Research0 citationsOpen Access

The Influence of Motivational Climate on Students’ Learning and Motivation in College STEM Lab Courses

View Full Paper
TWTroy O. WineingerMFMary D. FryEME. Whitney G. Moore

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the impact of motivational climate on students' learning and motivation in college STEM lab courses.
  • Surveyed 894 STEM students at the end of the semester
  • Measured perceptions of motivational climate and learner-related outcomes
  • Utilized analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare different lab climates
  • Examined individual and group-level outcomes based on climate perceptions
  • Students reported moderately high caring and high task-involving climates
  • Perceptions of caring and task-involving climates led to significantly higher scores in all outcomes
  • Group trends indicated significant differences in outcomes based on climate perceptions
  • Findings suggest a positive link between a supportive lab environment and improved student experiences

Abstract

Abstract Recruiting and retaining science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) college students is essential given the rising demand for professionals in these fields. Motivational climates in STEM labs, specifically caring and task-involving environments, may positively impact students’ college experiences. This study investigated whether perceptions of the motivational climate in biology labs impacted factors including students’ eagerness to attend lab, excitement for their major, preparation for future courses, belief in instructor support, and peer relationships. A total of 894 students completed end-of-semester surveys measuring their perceptions of their biology lab motivational climate and learner-related motivational outcomes. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare caring versus non-caring and task-involving versus non-task-involving lab climates at individual and group levels. Most students reported moderately high caring and high task-involving climates and neutral adaptive learning responses. Individually, students perceiving both a caring and task-involving climate scored significantly higher across all outcomes. When grouped by section, outcome variables showed higher trends and some significant differences for the caring and task-involving groups. Findings highlight that perceptions of a caring, task-involving lab climate may enhance students’ learning experiences, potentially improving retention and graduation rates. Instructors play a pivotal role in fostering such climates, which can enhance STEM educational outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wineinger et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69843564f1d9ada3c1fb42bbhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-025-00173-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper