PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Physiological Reports0 citationsOpen Access

A Bayesian approach to estimate minute ventilation from heart rate during exercise for assessing environmental exposures of females

View Full Paper
GOGustavo OnedaFBFernando Klitzke BorszczRWRaul Würdig

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop accurate predictive equations for estimating minute ventilation in females during exercise using heart rate.
  • Conducted an incremental running test with nineteen physically active females.
  • Measured minute ventilation, metabolic rate, and heart rate breath-by-breath.
  • Identified ventilatory thresholds for oxygen and carbon dioxide to evaluate exercise intensity domains.
  • Utilized a Bayesian framework to analyze data and improve model fit for minute ventilation estimates.
  • The exponential model achieved R² = 0.957 for the full incremental running test.
  • Linear models provided R² = 0.977 for moderate, heavy, and severe exercise intensity domains.
  • Improved accuracy in estimating minute ventilation from heart rate when exercise intensity is considered.

Abstract

Abstract Estimating minute ventilation (V̇ E ) is essential for assessing the health impacts of environmental exposures during exercise field‐studies. Predictive equations using heart rate (HR) are commonly used, but overlook exercise intensity domains, and reduced accuracy is shown, particularly for females. Thus, we developed predictive equations for females' V̇ E based on HR responses at different exercise intensity domains using a Bayesian approach. Nineteen physically active females performed an incremental running test with breath‐by‐breath measurements of V̇ E , metabolic rate, and HR. The first and second ventilatory thresholds were identified by measurement of the ventilatory equivalent for oxygen and carbon dioxide, respectively. The Bayesian framework showed that the model fit for estimating V̇ E by HR was improved when the incremental running test and its intensity domains were considered. An exponential model provided the best fit (V̇ E = 2.86 × exp.(0.019 × HR)) for the full incremental running test ( R 2 = 0.957), whereas linear models yielded superior fits when analyzing individual moderate (V̇ E = −32.92 + (HR × 0.19)), heavy (V̇ E = −101.94 + (HR × 0.99)) and severe (V̇ E = −268.81 + (HR × 1.98)) exercise intensity domains ( R 2 = 0.977). Accurate estimates of V̇ E from HR measurements must consider the exercise intensity domain and the linear regression model for better biomonitoring of human exposures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oneda et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69843583f1d9ada3c1fb458ehttps://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70767
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper