PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Journal of Foot and Ankle Research0 citationsOpen Access

Australian Podiatry Research in Rheumatology: A Bibliometric Analysis

View Full Paper
SBShan M. BerginPLPolly Q. X. LimMMenz

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to evaluate the volume and impact of Australian research on rheumatology published by podiatric authors.
  • Conducted a Scopus database search for Australian rheumatology articles by podiatric authors from 1970 to 2024.
  • Performed bibliometric analysis using open-source tools based on the R language.
  • Categorized articles based on research type, level of evidence, and funding sources.
  • Identified 89 eligible articles with a total of 2438 citations.
  • La Trobe University was the most published institution, affiliated with 151 authors.
  • 39% of articles focused on treatments and therapeutic interventions, while 12% provided Level I evidence.
  • 47% of publications received Category 1 funding, but 33% reported no research funding.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background To conduct a bibliographic analysis of English language foot and ankle research pertaining to rheumatology published by Australian authors. Methods The Scopus database search was conducted to identify all Australian rheumatology articles published by podiatric authors in English from 1970 to 2024. Bibliometric analysis was performed using an open‐source tool based on the R language. Citations, journals, authors, institutions and countries were described. Publications were manually categorised according to research type, level of evidence and funding source. Results The search strategy yielded 89 eligible articles, which received a total of 2438 citations and were published by 200 authors. The most frequent journals were Arthritis Care 39%) and 11 articles (12%) provided Level I evidence. Forty‐two publications (47%) were supported by Category 1 funding, however, 29 (33%) reported no research funding. Conclusion Rheumatology represents just 5% of Australian podiatry research. Despite this, it attracts high citation rates relative to number of publications and is well supported by Category 1 funding in comparison to other research fields. Funding sources outside of competitive Category 1 grants appear to be limited however, and research scope is narrow with a high number of evaluative studies conducted. Rheumatology research would benefit from an increase in available funding sources and a broader research scope that informs disease prevention and evidence‐based clinical care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bergin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69843583f1d9ada3c1fb46bfhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70128
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper