PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Apmis0 citationsOpen Access

Rapid Automated Immunohistochemistry on Frozen Sections Enables Real‐Time Surgical Pathology Decisions

View Full Paper
CQCamilla Christine QvistMEMie Bruun ElmbakJSJulie Smith

Key Points

  • This study aimed to optimize and validate Fast Frozen Rapid Automated Immunohistochemistry (FFRA-IHC) for intraoperative pathology.
  • Optimized FFRA-IHC using antibodies CKAE, CK5, CK7, CD45, and Synaptophysin.
  • Analyzed 44 tissue samples from surgical patients.
  • Compared results with traditional FS H&E and standard FFPE methods.
  • FFRA-IHC classified 68% of 37 tumors that FS H&E could not classify.
  • Resolved all five ambiguous resection margins.
  • Showed significant efficiency gains and reduced hands-on time compared to manual IHC.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Intraoperative frozen section (FS) analysis is critical in surgical pathology, but conventional hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining has limitations in poorly differentiated neoplasms and resection margins. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) provides higher diagnostic specificity, yet has traditionally been too time‐consuming for intraoperative urgency. This study aimed to optimize, validate, and evaluate Fast Frozen Rapid Automated Immunohistochemistry (FFRA‐IHC) using the Q‐Stain X Autostainer to improve surgical diagnostics. After optimization with antibodies CKAE, CK5, CK7, CD45, and Synaptophysin, 44 tissue samples from patients undergoing surgery at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, were analyzed by FS H&E, FFRA‐IHC, and standard formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) methods. Automated FFRA‐IHC showed high diagnostic accuracy and supported immediate clinical decision‐making: of 37 tumors not classifiable by FS H&E alone, 25 (68%) were classified into specific tumor types, and all five ambiguous resection margins were resolved. A cost–benefit analysis indicated efficiency gains with reduced hands‐on time compared to manual IHC. In conclusion, FFRA‐IHC demonstrated promising results for enhancing intraoperative diagnostics, leading to its implementation in the daily workflow at our department. Future studies should expand antibody panels and assess the broader clinical impact to further improve intra‐ and perioperative care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Qvist et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69843583f1d9ada3c1fb46ebhttps://doi.org/10.1111/apm.70145
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper