PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026International Archives of Allergy and Immunology1 citations

Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis in Children: A Comparative Analysis of Inpatient vs. Outpatient Settings

View Full Paper
GKGizem KokenHKHacer İlbilge Ertoy KaragölSTSinem Polat Terece

Key Points

  • This study compares the characteristics and management of pediatric drug-induced anaphylaxis in inpatient and outpatient settings.
  • Analyzed cases of drug-induced anaphylaxis in patients aged ≤18 years over 15 years.
  • Categorized patients into inpatient and outpatient groups based on their settings of care.
  • Evaluated triggering drugs, clinical presentations, treatment approaches, and associated comorbidities.
  • Out of 162 cases, 55% occurred in inpatient and 45% in outpatient settings.
  • Parenteral drug use was significantly higher in the inpatient group (p<0.001).
  • Inpatient group had more non-allergic chronic comorbidities, while outpatient group had higher rates of asthma and allergic rhinitis (p≤0.001).
  • Management practices differed significantly, with higher use of antihistamines and systemic corticosteroids in the outpatient group (p<0.05).

Abstract

Introduction: Studies specifically focusing on drug-induced anaphylaxis (DIA) in children are few. There is no study comparing inpatient (IP) and outpatient (OP) settings in DIA, either in children or in adults. We aimed to compare the characteristics of pediatric DIAs observed in IP and OP settings. Methods: Patients aged ≤18 years who were diagnosed with DIA at our institution over the past 15 years were included in the study. The diagnosis of DIA was made clinically, and diagnostic testing were performed in eligible patients. Patients were categorized as IP and OP groups based on the settings in which DIA occurred. Results: A total of 162 pediatric DIAs (55% IP vs. 45% OP) were reviewed. The most frequent triggering drugs were chemotherapeutics, enzyme replacement therapies for metabolic disorders, and antibiotics in IP group, and NSAIDs, antibiotics, and local anesthetics in OP group. Parenteral drug use was more frequent in IP group (p<0.001). Age at DIA, time to DIA, and severity of DIA were similar between the two groups. However, after excluding parenteral drugs from OP group, significant differences in all three parameters were seen in IP group (p<0.05 for each). Patients in IP group had more non-allergic chronic comorbidities and gastrointestinal symptoms, while OP group showed higher rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and acute infections as co-factors (p≤0.001 for each). Antihistamine and systemic corticosteroid use was higher in OP group (p<0.05 for each), but the use of IM adrenaline was similar in both groups. Conclusion: Triggering drugs, clinical presentations, management, chronic allergic and non-allergic comorbidities, and co-factors in pediatric DIA differ between the two groups. Contrary to expectations, the setting did not affect the onset or severity of DIA, likely due to the higher frequency of parenteral drug administration in OP settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Koken et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6984359ef1d9ada3c1fb499chttps://doi.org/10.1159/000550779
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper