SNO+, 0νββ, and the Modal Ontology of the Theory of Objectivity (TO): Compatibilities, Productive Tensions, and Operational Bridges between Experimental Neutrino Physics and Deductive Cosmology

This article develops a critical–propositional analysis of Inácio (2024) in disciplined confrontation with the foundational and recent literature of the Theory of Objectivity (TO), using the SNO+ program—especially its tellurium-loaded phase targeting neutrinoless double beta decay (0νββ) in ¹³⁰Te—as a privileged empirical arena where experimental method, conservation, symmetry, mass, and information become methodologically inseparable from ontological commitments. The paper does not claim that TO replaces contemporary particle physics or modern cosmology as predictive substitutes. Instead, it advances the thesis that TO must function as a logical–ontological base for any coherent model of a possible universe, given the modal necessity of its seven axioms and the AI-assisted evaluations that propose explicit testability schemes and revision rules for TO’s phenomenic elements and cosmological eras (Cabannas Vidamor neutrinoless double beta decay; 0νββ; ¹³⁰Te; Majorana neutrinos; lepton-number violation; rare-event searches; experimental neutrino physics; modal ontology; Theory of Objectivity; phenomenic elements; Expansive Inductor Effect; Reductive Inductor Effect; operational bridges; falsifiability; background modeling; cross-validation.