PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery0 citations

Risk Scale to Guide Prophylactic Paraspinous Flap Closure in High-Risk Spine Surgery

View Full Paper
AKAllison KarwoskiEJEsther JungKSKevin Schlidt

Key Points

  • To develop a risk scale that identifies patients who may benefit from prophylactic paraspinous flap closure during spine surgeries.
  • Conducted a retrospective cohort study from 2011-2022 at a single center.
  • Analyzed cases of posterior spine operations managed by plastic surgery.
  • Created a five-factor score based on routine patient variables.
  • Compared outcomes between prophylactic paraspinous flap and standard closure.
  • Complication rate in patients with prophylactic flap was 12.5%.
  • High-risk patients showed a significant reduction in reoperations from 20% to 0%.
  • The five-factor score categorized patients into low, intermediate, and high risk with complication rates of 7.9%, 11.7%, and 23.2%.

Abstract

Background: Wound failure after posterior spine surgery can lead to infection, hardware loss, and reoperation. Prophylactic paraspinous muscle flaps are used selectively, but criteria to select which patients benefit most have not been consistent. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study (2011–2022) of complex posterior spine operations closed by plastic surgery at a single center. The exposure was prophylactic paraspinous flap at the index operation versus standard primary closure. The primary outcome was a plastic surgery–managed wound complication requiring clinical intervention or return to the operating room. Using only routine pre and intraoperative variables, we created a five factor bedside score (obesity; lumbar/sacral level; albumin 250 minutes; American Society of Anesthesiologists ASA class ≥3) and a parallel logistic model that excluded treatment to estimate baseline risk and support decision making. Results: Among 281 operations, 150/281 (53%) received prophylactic paraspinous closure. Plastic-surgery–managed wound complications occurred in 35/281 (12.5%). A simple baseline-risk model separated patients into Low, Intermediate, and High-risk groups with observed complication rates of 7.9%, 11.7%, and 23.2%, respectively. Model performance was modest (area under the ROC curve AUC 0.66; optimism-corrected AUC 0.56; Brier 0.106). In adjusted analyses, ASA ≥3 was associated with higher odds of a wound complication (adjusted OR 9.35; 95% CI, 1.20–73.02). In the High-risk (4–5 points) group of the five-factor score, prophylactic closure reduced reoperations from 20.0% (4/20) to 0% (0/27) (absolute risk reduction ARR 20%; number needed to treat NNT 5; p=0.027). No significant differences were seen in the lower-risk groups. Conclusion: A simple five factor score stratifies baseline wound risk after posterior spine surgery and identifies patients most likely to benefit from prophylactic paraspinous flap closure. Selective, preoperative use in high risk patients may reduce returns to the operating room.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Karwoski et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698585678f7c464f23008b2bhttps://doi.org/10.1055/a-2803-4814
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Paraspinous Muscle Flaps in Complex Pediatric Spine Surgeries2024
  2. 2P20. The Utility of Prophylactic Muscle Flaps in Complex Pediatric Spine Surgery2024
  3. 3Plastic Surgery Involvement in Index Posterior Spine Surgery Reduces Complication Rates2026
  4. 4Development and validation of a point-of-care clinical risk score to predict surgical site complication-associated readmissions following open spine surgery2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5“Prophylactic Muscle Flap Closure After Spinal Fusion Improves Outcomes and Reduces Healthcare Costs”2025