PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026Applied Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Monte Carlo Simulation-Based Robustness Analysis of High-Speed Railway Settlement Prediction Models for Non-Stationary Time Series

View Full Paper
ZLZhenyu LiuHZHu ZengHGHuiqin Guo

Key Points

  • To assess the robustness and accuracy of various settlement prediction models for high-speed railway foundations using Monte Carlo simulations.
  • Developed a numerical model to simulate settlement based on permeability characteristics of soft foundations.
  • Employed Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate model accuracy and stability under stochastic conditions.
  • Constructed a multi-metric evaluation framework incorporating goodness-of-fit, systematic error, and random error.
  • Assessed four classical empirical models: Hyperbolic, Exponential Curve, Asaoka, and Hoshino.
  • The Hyperbolic Method demonstrated superior performance with a correlation coefficient of 0.983 ± 0.006 and systematic error of 3.2% ± 1.1%.
  • The Hoshino Method exhibited the highest stability with the lowest random error of 3.8 ± 2.0 mm.
  • Model performance positively correlated with the permeability coefficient (R2 > 0.92).
  • Performance ranking: Hyperbolic > Hoshino > Exponential Curve > Asaoka.

Abstract

Accurate prediction of post-construction settlement in high-speed railway (HSR) soft foundations is critical for operational safety yet challenging due to the non-equidistant and non-stationary nature of observation data. This study systematically evaluated the robustness and accuracy of settlement prediction models using a Monte Carlo simulation approach. A numerical model incorporating the permeability characteristics of soft foundations was established to simulate stochastic system responses. Furthermore, an innovative multi-metric evaluation framework was constructed using the entropy weight method, integrating goodness-of-fit, prediction accuracy (systematic error), and stability (random error). Four classical empirical models—Hyperbolic, Exponential Curve, Asaoka, and Hoshino—were assessed. The results indicate that: (1) The Hyperbolic Method significantly outperformed other models (p0.92). Validated by five distinct engineering cases, the comprehensive performance ranking was determined as: Hyperbolic > Hoshino > Exponential Curve > Asaoka. These findings provide a scientific strategy for model selection under non-stationary conditions and offer theoretical support for refining railway deformation monitoring standards.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698585758f7c464f23008df4https://doi.org/10.3390/app16031566
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Monte Carlo Simulation Framework for Evaluating the Robustness and Applicability of Settlement Prediction Models in High-Speed Railway Soft Foundations2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2A comparative analysis of the principal component analysis and entropy weight methods to establish the indexing measurement2022 · 189 citations
  3. 3Analysis of interpolation algorithms for the missing values in IoT time series: a case of air quality in Taiwan2019 · 29 citations
  4. 4Appraisal of Numerous Machine Learning Techniques for the Prediction of Consolidation Settlement Subjected to Placing of the Fill2025 · 6 citations
  5. 5Time series forecasting for nonlinear and non-stationary processes: a review and comparative study2015 · 283 citations