PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

Prognostic effects of sex on MINOCA outcomes

View Full Paper
JHJ HerreraCFC Herrera FloresRVR Vernooij

Key Result

Sex was not associated with differences in in-hospital mortality or all-cause death at follow-up (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.76-1.13) among patients with MINOCA.

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine how sex affects the prognosis of patients with MINOCA, focusing on mortality and adverse events.
  • Conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases.
  • Included prospective and retrospective studies evaluating sex and outcomes in MINOCA.
  • Performed independent screening, data extraction, and quality assessment of studies.
  • Meta-analyzed data using a random-effect model to calculate odds ratios.
  • Analyzed fifteen studies encompassing 42,870 patients (58.7% women).
  • Reported 277 in-hospital deaths and 2236 deaths during a mean 3.5-year follow-up.
  • Found no significant sex differences in in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.05) or follow-up mortality (OR: 0.93).

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=42,870)

Structured PICO

Does sex influence in-hospital and follow-up mortality or MACE in patients with MINOCA?

P
Population
15 studies comprising 42,870 patients with Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), 58.7% women, mean age 62.0 ± 3.7 years.
I
Intervention
Female sex
C
Comparator
Male sex
O
Outcome
In-hospital all-cause mortality and all-cause mortality at follow-uphard clinical

This meta-analysis demonstrates that despite MINOCA being more prevalent in women, sex does not significantly influence in-hospital or long-term all-cause mortality.

Main Result

Effect estimate: OR 0.93 (95% CI 0.76-1.13)

Abstract

Abstract Background Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is more prevalent in women than men, yet the impact of sex on prognosis remains uncertain. Objective To evaluate sex-related differences in overall mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during hospitalization and follow-up among MINOCA patients. Methods A detailed search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was conducted through the end of 2024. Eligible prospective and retrospective studies evaluating the association between sex and adverse clinical outcomes in MINOCA patients were included. Independent screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed. All studies were meta-analyzed using a random-effect model. Main Outcomes for in-hospital (all-cause mortality) and at follow-up (all-cause mortality) outcomes in the overall pooled populations and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results Fifteen studies comprising 42,870 patients (58.7% women; mean age 62.0 ± 3.7 years) were analyzed. A total of 277 patients died during hospitalization, and 2236 deaths occurred during a mean follow-up of 3.5 ± 0.9 years. Pooled analyses (picture 1) demonstrated no sex differences in in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.05, 95% CI 0.82–1.34, I2 = 0%) or all-cause death at follow-up (OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.76–1.13, I2 = 54%). Conclusions Sex does not seem to influence the prognosis of MINOCA.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Herrera et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) (n=42,870). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on all-cause death at follow-up (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.76-1.13). Sex was not associated with differences in in-hospital mortality or all-cause death at follow-up (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.76-1.13) among patients with MINOCA.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698585aa8f7c464f23009353https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.2173
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper