PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Enhancing the accuracy of spatio-temporal models for wind speed prediction by incorporating bias-corrected crowdsourced data

View Full Paper
EOEamonn OrganMUMaeve UptonDADenis Allard

Key Points

  • The aim is to enhance wind speed prediction accuracy by integrating bias-corrected data from personal weather stations into spatiotemporal models.
  • Developed a framework for incorporating data from personal weather stations (PWS)
  • Conducted bias correction on PWS data using reanalysis data
  • Implemented a Bayesian hierarchical spatiotemporal model to account for measurement errors
  • Validated predictions against official meteorological station data
  • Incorporating bias-corrected PWS data resulted in an average 5% reduction in prediction error
  • The model's accuracy was comparable to popular reanalysis products
  • The approach allows real-time data availability and improved uncertainty quantification

Abstract

Accurate high-resolution spatial and temporal wind speed data is critical for estimating the wind energy potential of a location. For real-time wind speed prediction, statistical models typically depend on high-quality (near) real-time data from official meteorological stations to improve forecasting accuracy. Personal weather stations (PWS) offer an additional source of real-time data and broader spatial coverage than official stations. However, they are not subject to rigorous quality control and may exhibit bias or measurement errors. This article presents a framework for incorporating PWS data into statistical models for validated official meteorological station data via a two-stage approach. First, bias correction is performed on PWS wind speed data using reanalysis data. Second, we implement a Bayesian hierarchical spatiotemporal model that accounts for varying measurement error in the PWS data. This enables wind speed prediction across a target area, and is particularly beneficial for improving predictions in regions sparse in official monitoring stations. Our results show that including bias-corrected PWS data improves prediction accuracy compared with using meteorological station data alone, with a 5% reduction in prediction error on average across all sites. The results are comparable with popular reanalysis products, but unlike these numerical weather models our approach is available in real-time and offers improved uncertainty quantification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Organ et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698585db8f7c464f230099f0https://doi.org/10.34961/19220
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper