First-degree AV block in patients presenting with syncope was associated with higher rates of pacemaker implantation (28% vs. 12.9%, HR 3.8; 95% CI 2.7-5.2; p<0.001) over a 2-year follow-up.
Cohort
Yes
Does the presence of first-degree AV block predict pacemaker implantation and adverse outcomes in patients presenting with syncope?
3,748 patients presenting with syncope to the emergency department, comprising a primary multicenter cohort of patients >40 years (n=2,000) and a US-based external validation cohort of patients ≥60 years (n=1,748).
Presence of first-degree AV block
Absence of first-degree AV block
Pacemaker implantation and a composite of recurrent syncope, life-threatening arrhythmias, pacemaker implantation, and death over a 2-year follow-up periodcomposite
First-degree AV block in patients presenting with syncope is a significant predictor of adverse outcomes and future pacemaker implantation, challenging the traditional view that it is a benign finding.
Abstract Background First-degree atrioventricular (AV) block is traditionally considered benign; however, it is increasingly recognized as a marker for adverse outcomes, including pacemaker implantation. Patients with syncope and first-degree AV block represent a particularly challenging subgroup due to the difficulty predicting which patients are at risk for adverse outcomes, with current guidelines providing limited guidance for risk stratification. Purpose To address this knowledge gap by evaluating predictors of pacemaker implantation and adverse outcomes in patients with first-degree AV block and syncope. Methods The multicenter, prospective cohort study (BASEL IX) recruited patients 40 years presenting with syncope to the emergency department (ED) across 14 hospitals in nine countries. The SRS study, a US-based cohort enrolling patients ≥60 years with syncope, was used for external validation. Multivariable regression models were used to identify predictors of pacemaker implantation. Outcomes included pacemaker implantation and a composite of recurrent syncope, life-threatening arrhythmias, pacemaker implantation, and death. Subgroup analyses assessed the impact of PQ interval duration and beta-blocker use on the risk of pacemaker implantation and adverse clinical outcomes. Results First-degree AV block was present in 16.5% (329/2000) of patients and associated with higher rates of pacemaker implantation (28% vs. 12.9%, HR 3.8, 95% CI: 2.7–5.2, p0.001) and serious adverse outcomes (45.3% vs. 25.7%, HR 2.2, 95% CI: 1.8–2.7, p0.001) over a 2-year follow-up period. Key predictors of pacemaker implantation included right bundle branch block (RBBB), left anterior fascicular block (LAFB), prolonged QTc interval, diabetes, recurrent syncope and head injury. Patients requiring pacemakers within two years had median PR intervals of 240 ms at initial presentation, challenging guidelines focused on extreme PR prolongation. Beta-blocker use was not associated with adverse outcomes. Findings were consistent in the validation cohort with a 30-day follow-up, where first-degree AV block was present in 16% (272/1748) of patients and associated with a threefold increase in pacemaker implantation (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.6–5.6, p0.001). Conclusion First-degree AV block in patients presenting with a syncope is associated with a substantial risk of adverse outcomes, even when PR intervals are moderately prolonged. Subgroup with first-degree AV block
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Eytan Kaplan
T Zimmermann
J Du Fay De Lavallaz
European Heart Journal
University of Pennsylvania
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kaplan et al. (Sat,) conducted a cohort in Syncope (n=3,748). First-degree AV block vs. No first-degree AV block was evaluated on Pacemaker implantation (HR 3.8, 95% CI 2.7-5.2, p=<0.001). First-degree AV block in patients presenting with syncope was associated with higher rates of pacemaker implantation (28% vs. 12.9%, HR 3.8; 95% CI 2.7-5.2; p<0.001) over a 2-year follow-up.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698586238f7c464f2300a04a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.560
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: