University students commonly experience high levels of stress, which negatively impacts on academic performance, engagement and well-being. Coping strategies can be employed to manage stress, but there have not been extensive examinations of student motivations for selecting coping strategies and how selection of strategies changes during a semester. This study explored sources of stress and coping strategies used by first-year undergraduate students across a semester. It examined reasons for strategy selection, and the relationships between coping strategies, academic engagement and performance. Participants were 203 consenting first-year undergraduate sport science students in Australia. Students responded to open-ended questions at the beginning and end of semester, and responses were subjected to thematic analysis. Frequencies of responses were correlated with measures of engagement and academic performance. The primary sources of stress were academic pressures, alongside social, financial, and personal challenges. At the beginning of semester, students predominantly intended to employ problem-focused coping strategies, such as time management and study techniques. However, by the semester’s end, students more frequently reported using strategies such as exercise, balancing work and life, meditation and yoga. Students’ reported reasons for strategy use indicated that coping mechanisms served dual functions, both alleviating emotional distress and supporting study effectiveness, regardless of whether traditionally classified as problem- or emotion-focused. Employing more coping strategies positively correlated with higher academic performance. These findings suggest that encouraging a diverse range of adaptive coping strategies, while considering students’ motivations for strategy selection, can support students’ academic success and well-being.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
E. S. Louise Faber
Jemma Campbell
Laura Carniel
AJP Advances in Physiology Education
The University of Queensland
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Faber et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698586238f7c464f2300a0e2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00292.2025
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: