Reverse controlled antegrade and retrograde tracking (CART) had a higher technical success rate (94.7%) compared to other methods for long CTOs (P < 0.01).
What are the temporal trends and procedural outcomes of different wiring techniques in PCI for long coronary chronic total occlusions?
10,302 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) between January 2015 and December 2022, including 5,627 (54.6%) with long CTOs (occlusion length ≥20 mm).
Various CTO-PCI techniques including primary retrograde approach, reverse controlled antegrade and retrograde tracking (CART), antegrade wiring, and IVUS-guided wiring after antegrade wiring.
Comparison among different CTO-PCI techniques and temporal trends over the study period.
Technical success rate, guidewire crossing time, incidence of coronary perforation, and temporal trends in technique usage.
In PCI for long CTOs, reverse CART provides the highest technical success but carries a higher risk of coronary perforation and longer crossing times, while antegrade approaches are increasingly favored for lesions with good distal landing zones.
Abstract Background Data on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for long chronic total occlusions (CTOs) are limited. Purpose We sought to identify temporal trends in PCI for long CTOs. Methods We studied patients undergoing CTO-PCI between January 2015 and December 2022. Long CTO was defined as an occlusion length of ≥20 mm. Results The study population consisted of 10,302 patients, of whom 5,627 (54.6%) had a long CTO. Of these, 1,937 CTOs (34.4%) underwent primary retrograde approach and 1,486 CTOs (26.4%) underwent reverse controlled antegrade and retrograde tracking (CART). Reverse CART had a higher technical success rate than retrograde wiring and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided wiring after antegrade wiring (94.7%, 91.0%, and 81.6%, respectively), a longer guidewire crossing time (124, 92, and 85 minutes, respectively), and a higher incidence of coronary perforation (8.5%, 4.9%, and 6.3%, respectively) (P 0.01 for all). For long CTOs with good distal landing without side branches, the use of primary retrograde approach and reverse CART decreased over time from 39.9% to 27.3% and from 36.3% to 20.1%, respectively, whereas the use of antegrade wiring and IVUS-guided wiring after antegrade wiring increased from 46.6% to 58.7% and from 1.0% to 8.7%, respectively (P for trend 0.01 for all). For long CTOs with poor distal landing or a bifurcation at the distal cap, the use of primary retrograde approach and reverse CART did not decrease from 31.6% to 30.9% and from 24.8% to 23.1% (P for trend = 0.17 and 0.29, respectively). Conclusions In PCI for long CTOs, reverse CART was the most commonly used re-entry technique and had higher technical success, longer guidewire crossing time, and higher coronary perforation. For long CTOs with good distal landing without side branches, the use of primary retrograde approach and reverse CART decreased, whereas the use of antegrade wiring and IVUS-guided wiring after antegrade wiring increased.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
H Tanaka
E Tsuchikane
Y Ito
European Heart Journal
The University of Osaka
Cardiovascular Institute Hospital
Kurashiki Central Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tanaka et al. (Sat,) reported a other. Reverse controlled antegrade and retrograde tracking (CART) had a higher technical success rate (94.7%) compared to other methods for long CTOs (P < 0.01).
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698586238f7c464f2300a10e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.3175