Cardiologists demonstrated significantly higher mean knowledge scores regarding guideline-directed medical therapy for ischemic heart disease compared to clinical pharmacists (19.54 vs 17.52; p<0.001).
Cross-Sectional
No
76 healthcare professionals (42 cardiologists and 34 clinical pharmacists) involved in the clinical management of patients with ischemic heart disease at a tertiary-care cardiac hospital (Punjab Institute of Cardiology) in Lahore, Pakistan.
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) scores regarding Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) for ischemic heart disease
Although knowledge and attitudes toward GDMT for ischemic heart disease are generally high among Pakistani cardiologists and clinical pharmacists, actual implementation practices remain moderate, highlighting the need for targeted system-level strategies.
Background Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) is central to managing ischemic heart disease (IHD), yet its implementation remains suboptimal in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Pakistan. Aim This study assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of healthcare professionals (HCPs) toward GDMT and identified key barriers to its application. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among HCPs including cardiologists and clinical pharmacists using a validated questionnaire. Data was collected from Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore, Pakistan using convenience sampling. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis, and multiple linear regression analyses were used to evaluate KAP scores and their association with demographic and professional role. Statistical adjustment for multiple comparisons was done by Bonferroni correction. Results A total of 76 HCPs participated in the survey, comprising 42 cardiologists (55.3%) and 34 clinical pharmacists (44.7%). he overall mean knowledge score was 18.64 ± 2.02 out of 22 (84.7%). However, cardiologists (M = 19.54) scored significantly higher than clinical pharmacists (M = 17.52, p < 0.001); thus rejecting the null hypothesis. Knowledge scores were significantly higher among older professionals, those with postgraduate education, and clinic-based practitioners (p < 0.05). The average attitude score was 10.42 ± 2.06 out of 14 (74.4%), with younger professionals (aged 28–33), cardiologists, and postgraduates showing more favorable attitudes (p < 0.05). The mean practice score was 9.51 ± 2.55 (67.9%), with no significant differences by gender, role, or setting. Regression models showed age and profession significantly predicted knowledge, while attitude was influenced by education, experience, gender, and profession. Practice behaviors were not predicted by any demographic variables. Key barriers to GDMT implementation included limited consultation time (47.4%) and poor patient adherence (25%). Conclusion Although GDMT knowledge and attitudes were generally high among Pakistani cardiologists and clinical pharmacists, reported practice remained moderate. The results underscore the need for targeted educational interventions and system-level strategies to support consistent GDMT implementation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Umm-e- Kalsoom
Amjad Khan
Syed Sikandar Shah
PLoS ONE
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kalsoom et al. (Wed,) conducted a cross-sectional in Ischemic heart disease (n=76). Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) survey was evaluated on Mean knowledge score regarding GDMT (out of 22) (p=<0.001). Cardiologists demonstrated significantly higher mean knowledge scores regarding guideline-directed medical therapy for ischemic heart disease compared to clinical pharmacists (19.54 vs 17.52; p<0.001).
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698586388f7c464f2300a209 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338634
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: