Diastolic dysfunction is associated with a 2.1-fold higher risk of postoperative heart failure in non-cardiac surgery patients with elevated filling pressure.
Does elevated left-sided filling pressure (diastolic dysfunction) predict postoperative heart failure or mortality in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery?
3,882 adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery with preoperative echocardiograms (excluding severe valve disease), mean age 69, 47% female.
Elevated left-sided filling pressure (grade 2-3 diastolic dysfunction) on preoperative echocardiogram
Normal left-sided filling pressure (grade 0-1 diastolic dysfunction) on preoperative echocardiogram
Composite of postoperative heart failure or mortalitycomposite
Preoperative echocardiographic evidence of elevated left-sided filling pressure (grade 2-3 diastolic dysfunction) significantly increases the risk of postoperative heart failure, mortality, and prolonged hospital stay in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.
Abstract Background Non-cardiac surgeries are increasing, necessitating better preoperative risk assessment. Cardiovascular complications remain a major cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality. While systolic function is a known predictor, diastolic dysfunction may also impact outcomes but is not included in risk models. Purpose To evaluate the association between echocardiographic diastolic dysfunction and postoperative heart failure in non-cardiac surgery patients. Methods This retrospective study analyzed adults who had non-cardiac surgery at our Medical Center (2011–2023) with preoperative echocardiograms. Severe valve disease cases were excluded. Diastolic dysfunction was classified into normal left sided filling pressure (grade 0–1) or elevated filling pressure (grade 2–3). The primary outcome was postoperative heart failure or mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, pulmonary edema, diuretic and vasoactive drug use, and hospital stay length. Results Among 3,882 patients (mean age 69, 47% female), 44.9% had grade 0, 33.3% grade 1, 18.6% grade 2, and 3.1% grade 3 dysfunction. Primary outcome occurred in 13.9% overall, higher in the elevated filling pressure group (22.3%) vs. normal filling pressure group (11.6%, OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.7–2.6, P 0.001). In-hospital mortality was also higher (9.1% vs. 4.2%, OR 2.2, P 0.001). Pulmonary edema (3.8% vs. 0.7%, OR 4.9, P 0.001). Diuretic use (12.9% vs. 5.5%, OR 2.5, P 0.001) and vasoactive drug use (7.9% vs. 5.4%, OR 1.5, P = 0.007) were also higher in the elevated filling pressure group, which also showed a longer hospital length of stay (15.4 vs. 12 days, P 0.001). Conclusion Diastolic dysfunction predicts perioperative complications, including heart failure and mortality, in non-cardiac surgery. Incorporating diastolic function into risk models may improve outcomes by enhancing risk stratification and guiding perioperative management. Further prospective studies are needed to determine whether targeted interventions in high-risk patients could reduce complications and improve long-term recovery.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sheizaf Gefen
Ofer Havakuk
Y Granot
European Heart Journal
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Mount Sinai Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gefen et al. (Sat,) reported a other. Diastolic dysfunction is associated with a 2.1-fold higher risk of postoperative heart failure in non-cardiac surgery patients with elevated filling pressure.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698586388f7c464f2300a381 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.934