Higher systolic blood pressure time in target range (66-100%) was associated with a lower risk of heart failure compared to <66% time in target range (adjusted HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.56-0.98; P=0.034).
Observational
Does higher systolic blood pressure time in target range reduce heart failure risk in patients with intensive or standard blood pressure targets?
7,962 participants from the SPRINT trial with intensive (<120 mmHg) or standard (<140 mmHg) systolic blood pressure targets
Higher systolic blood pressure time in target range (TTR) (66% to 100%)
Lower systolic blood pressure time in target range (TTR) (<66%)
Heart failure riskhard clinical
Higher systolic blood pressure time in target range is independently associated with reduced heart failure risk, an effect partially mediated by favorable changes in NT-proBNP and eGFR.
Abstract Aims Although achieving lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) targets reduces HF risk, the role and mechanisms of SBP time in target range (TTR) in heart failure (HF) risk and related biomarkers remain unclear. This study investigates the relationship between SBP TTR and HF risk, along with changes in biomarkers over one year and their potential mediating roles. Methods This post-hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) examined the association between SBP TTR and HF risk among 7962 participants with intensive (120 mmHg) or standard (140 mmHg) SBP targets. SBP TTR was calculated using the Rosendaal method. Biomarker changes in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over one year were analyzed as potential mediators. Cox proportional hazards models and mediation analyses assessed relationships between SBP TTR, biomarkers, and HF outcomes. Results Participants with higher SBP TTR (66% to 100%) exhibited significantly lower risks of HF (adjusted HR: 0.74; 95% confidence interval CI: 0.56–0.98; P=0.034) and the composite outcome of HF and all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64–0.92; P=0.004) compared to lower SBP TTR (66%). High SBP TTR was associated with favorable changes in NT-proBNP and eGFR, but not hs-cTnI. Mediation analyses revealed that NT-proBNP mediated 4.305% of the effect of SBP TTR on HF or death risk (P=0.006), while eGFR mediated 3.489% (P=0.002). Conclusions Higher SBP TTR is independently associated with reduced HF risk, with this effect partially mediated by NT-proBNP and eGFR. These findings may support SBP TTR as a potential therapeutic target for HF prevention.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
W H Chen
S S Shi
Z J Li
European Heart Journal
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
Capital Medical University
Fu Wai Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chen et al. (Sat,) conducted a observational in Heart failure risk (n=7,962). Higher SBP TTR (66% to 100%) vs. Lower SBP TTR (<66%) was evaluated on Heart failure risk (adjusted HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56-0.98, p=0.034). Higher systolic blood pressure time in target range (66-100%) was associated with a lower risk of heart failure compared to <66% time in target range (adjusted HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.56-0.98; P=0.034).
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698586388f7c464f2300a3ae — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.1405
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: