The BOOST-LV score predicted 3-year mortality in ALVSD patients with an AUC of 0.84, significantly outperforming LVEF (AUC 0.55) and GLS (AUC 0.60).
Does the BOOST-LV machine learning risk score improve 3-year mortality prediction compared to LVEF and GLS alone in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction?
10,529 patients with asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ALVSD, defined as LVEF < 50% or average global longitudinal strain > -16) from a single-center registry.
BOOST-LV machine learning risk score (incorporating age, LVEF, average GLS, hemoglobin, albumin, and red blood cell distribution width)
LVEF and GLS alone
3-year mortalityhard clinical
A novel machine learning-based risk score (BOOST-LV) significantly outperforms LVEF and GLS alone in predicting 3-year mortality among patients with asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Abstract Background Asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ALVSD) is categorized as stage B heart failure and when present it indicates a worse prognosis compared to individuals with normal left ventricular contraction. Consequently, prognostic prediction for patients with ALVSD is crucial; however, no models specifically tailored to risk prediction in patients with ALVSD are currently available. Therefore, we developed a machine learning (ML)-based model to predict 3-year mortality in patients with ALVSD. Methods We conducted an analysis using data from a single-center registry, which included patients who underwent echocardiography between September 2013 and March 2020. ALVSD was defined by either left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 50% or an average global longitudinal strain (GLS) greater than -16 in asymptomatic patients, consistent with prior research and the guideline. Extreme Gradient Boosting algorithm was applied to derive the risk score (BOOST-LV) for ALVSD patients. We identified 10,529 ALVSD patients categorized as high-risk and low-risk and used this cohort for model creation. We created a risk score that incorporates six critical variables: age, LVEF, average GLS, hemoglobin, albumin, and red blood cell distribution width. The performance of BOOST-LV score was then evaluated in the validation cohort and compared with that of LVEF and GLS using receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The BOOST-LV risk score was also divided into seven intervals and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to analyze and plot the 3-year survival rates for each score interval, along with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results BOOST-LV score exhibited strong predictive performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.83–0.85) in ROC curve analysis, which was superior to that of LVEF (AUC 0.55) and GLS (AUC 0.60). In the plot of 3-year survival rates, patients with very low scores experienced almost no mortality events within 3 years, whereas the likelihood of survival decreased sharply with higher BOOST-LV scores. Conclusions The BOOST-LV score, developed from ALVSD patients, effectively predicts mortality and surpasses LVEF and GLS in 3-year risk prediction. This novel risk score may provide a valuable tool for the personalized management of ALVSD patients.Figure 1 Figure 2, Figure 3
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yoshimitsu Takaoka
J J Park
D Bangaru-Raju
European Heart Journal
University of California, San Diego
University of San Diego
New Generation University College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Takaoka et al. (Sat,) reported a other. The BOOST-LV score predicted 3-year mortality in ALVSD patients with an AUC of 0.84, significantly outperforming LVEF (AUC 0.55) and GLS (AUC 0.60).
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698586498f7c464f2300a4d2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.3524