Using AI-enabled electrocardiography, the HR for ARNi vs ACEi treatment in HFrEF was emulated at 0.84, aligning with RCT results, unlike traditional methods (HR >1).
Does ARNi reduce all-cause mortality compared to ACEi in patients with HFrEF when evaluated using AI-ECG digital-twin matching in real-world data?
4,705 individuals with HFrEF (ejection fraction <40%) meeting PARADIGM-HF trial criteria, mean age 68.9, 36% women, from a diverse US-based healthcare network.
Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi)
Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)
All-cause mortalityhard clinical
High-dimensional phenotypic matching using AI-ECG to create digital twins can successfully emulate RCT treatment effects from real-world data, overcoming confounding that limits traditional adjustment methods.
Abstract Background The inference of causal treatment effects from real-world data (RWD) is often limited by confounding that remains unmeasured in structured/tabular data. We hypothesized that a digital-twin framework, leveraging AI-enabled electrocardiography (AI-ECG) to perform high-dimensional matching of individuals, could better emulate randomized-controlled trial (RCT) treatment effects. Purpose We report our novel DISCO (Digital Inference of Strong Causality from Observational data) approach to emulate RCTs, applied to heart failure (HF) clinical trials (Figure 1). This computational framework uses high-dimensional representations of unstructured data, specifically AI-enabled decomposition of ECGs into an embedding, then phenotypically matches individuals to assess medication effects. Methods We curated a cohort of patients from a diverse US-based healthcare network, identifying individuals with HFrEF (ejection fraction40%) who initiated angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) or angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) treatment, and measured clinical outcomes including all-cause mortality. Patients meeting PARADIGM-HF trial criteria were assigned to "intervention" (ARNi) or "control" (ACEi) arms. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using traditional survival analysis techniques, adjusting for measurable baseline differences including age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes) and history (myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, stroke). For each patient, a digital twin was created by leveraging embeddings from a convolutional neural network AI-ECG algorithm tuned to left ventricular ejection fraction. K-means clusters were defined in this embedding space (K=10), with treatment effects evaluated in each homogenous cluster. Results Among 4,705 individuals with HFrEF (mean age 68.9, 36% women), the RCT-defined HR for ARNi vs ACEi of 0.84 was not mimicked by traditional methods for estimating treatment effects from RWD (Table 1). In Cox regression, the HR was 1 in unadjusted analysis, as well as in analyses adjusted for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors and history. When we used an AI-driven approach for phenotypic matching of individuals, the digital-twin cohorts parallel the published HR 1. We further support this finding by comparing the balance of prognostic factors between arms in the digital-twin cohorts, observing that these approximated randomized conditions. Subgroup analyses of AI-ECG defined phenotypes revealed significant heterogeneity in response to ARNi therapy, suggesting some subpopulations may derive larger benefit. Conclusion We demonstrate the use of high-dimensional digital twins for emulating RCTs using real-world data. The work suggests a role for robust causal inference for healthcare interventions in RWD and the potential role for AI-ECG in novel pragmatic RCT designs, including those leveraging synthetic controls.Figure 1 Table 1
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Biswas et al. (Sat,) reported a other. Using AI-enabled electrocardiography, the HR for ARNi vs ACEi treatment in HFrEF was emulated at 0.84, aligning with RCT results, unlike traditional methods (HR >1).
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698586ad8f7c464f2300a65b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.4614
D Biswas
L S Dhingra
A Aminorroaya
European Heart Journal
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...