PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 7, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Pore-micro fracture structure, porosity and gas- bearing property of deep shale under lithofacies-formation pressure coupling

View Full Paper
YZYong ZhangHZHao ZhangLZL Zhang

Key Points

  • To investigate the influence of lithofacies and formation pressure on the micro porous structure and gas-bearing characteristics of shale reservoirs.
  • Integrated analysis using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and low-temperature N2 adsorption (LTNA).
  • Identification of three lithofacies: siliceous, argillaceous, and mixed in Longmaxi deep-buried shale.
  • Observation of pore size distributions and their contributions to pore volume and specific surface area.
  • Pore size < 4 nm contributes mainly to specific surface area, while 4-30 nm pores contribute to pore volume.
  • Pressure variations affect organic matter pores but not intraparticle pores; interparticle pore variability is observed among lithofacies.
  • Organic-rich shale demonstrates strong reservoir properties under compaction compared to organic-poor shale.

Abstract

Formation pressure-lithofacies type are the most critical factors influencing micro pore structure and porosity in shale reservoir. However, how these two factors jointly affect shale gas accumulation remains unclear. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), on-site desorption and low-temperature N 2 adsorption (LTNA) are integrated to analyze coupling effects of pressure variation and lithofacies on reservoir quality and gas-bearing characteristics of deep-buried shale. Three lithofacies are identified in Longmaxi deep-buried shale: siliceous lithofacies (S), argillaceous lithofacies (CM) and mixed lithofacies (M). Pores with pore size < 4 nm are the main contributors to the specific surface area (SSA), and pores between 4 nm and 30 nm are the main contributors to the pore volume (PV). Pressure variations directly affect the size and number of organic matter pores but have no impact on intraparticle pores. The variability in interparticle pores indicates that the S lithofacies has a stronger resistance to compaction compared to the M lithofacies. Porosity and micro structure of deep-buried shale reservoir are influenced by lithofacies type, burial depth and pressure variation. Organic-rich S shale and organic-poor S shale demonstrate good reservoir properties under over-pressure and well-preserved conditions, with organic-rich S shale having the strongest resistance to compaction. Organic and inorganic pores are largely lost during compaction of organic-rich M shale. CM lithofacies also has a poor material foundation and the weakest resistance to compaction, making it difficult to preserve original porosity and pore structure during compaction. The decrease in formation pressure results in macropores making almost no contribution to pore volume, while the contribution of mesopores is further enhanced. As the formation pressure decreases, the contribution of micropores to pore volume is gradually increased. As shale porosity decreases, porosity associated with macro pores declines first, followed by that associated with mesopores. Free-gas content in the CM and M lithofacies declines rapidly as porosity decreases. Both adsorbed and free gas decrease sharply as porosity is lost.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698692e89d267392364c99b3https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38352-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper