PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026National Science Review0 citationsOpen Access

Orchestrating structure and chemistry dynamics for cluster catalysis

View Full Paper
JCJia-Lan ChenHWHongyue WangCRChi Ruan

Key Points

  • The central aim is to explore the dynamics between structure and chemistry in supported metal clusters for enhanced catalytic performance.
  • Identified and classified three regimes of dynamics: fluxional, kinetically trapped, and coupled.
  • Developed a dimensionless metric (Nc) to differentiate between the regimes based on structural and chemical timescales.
  • Utilized CO adsorption–desorption on Cun/TiO2(110) clusters as a model system to demonstrate findings.
  • Established that an optimal Nc value (≈ 1) maximizes catalytic turnover by matching structural and chemical dynamics.
  • Demonstrated how different metal clusters influence their dynamic regime—coinage clusters bias towards fluxionality, while others promote trapping.
  • Revealed tunable leverages to drive clusters into the optimal coupled regime for better activity.

Abstract

Abstract Supported metal clusters maximize atom efficiency and expose diverse low-coordination metal motifs, but under reaction conditions, they are inherently fluxional—adsorbed reactants can constantly reform and even break the underlying metal–metal and metal–support bonds, generating an ensemble of metastable structures for catalysis. Identification of the interplay between supported clusters and surface chemistries is vital but a challenge for their complex dynamic evolutions. Here, we uncover three characteristic and universal regimes: (i) a fluxional regime, where fast restructuring erases site individuality; (ii) a kinetically trapped regime, where slow restructuring freezes the catalyst into a single geometry; and (iii) a unique coupled regime, where structural dynamics and chemistry occur on comparable timescales and where multiple metastable motifs actively participate in turnover. Moreover, we identify a single, dimensionless metric, Nc = τstruct/τchem, the ratio between the structural rearrangement timescale (τstruct) and the chemical residence time of the reactant (τchem), to differentiate these three regimes with distinct activity and stability. It is found that Nc should be neither too small (fluxional regime) nor too large (kinetically trapped regime). When the optimal value Nc ≈ 1 is approached (coupled regime), structural and chemical ‘clocks’ match, enabling the multiple active metastable isomers to persist long enough to participate in turnover and maximize reaction rates. Using CO adsorption–desorption on size-selected Cun​/TiO2(110) clusters as a model system, we demonstrate a master kinetic curve versus Nc and reveal tunable levers that drive clusters into the optimal coupled regime. Trends generalize across metals: coinage clusters (Ag, Au) bias fluxionality, Rh/Pd favor trapping, and Cu and Pt/Ru often lie near the coupled boundary. Time-scale matching thus emerges as a design rule for adaptive, fluxional catalysts with high activity and stability at the same time.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698827570fc35cd7a88460f7https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwag072
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper