PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Kōtuitui New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online0 citationsOpen Access

Colonial Bias in AI Training Data: Prompting Sora to Generate Images of Aotearoa New Zealand's Historical Past

View Full Paper
OHOlli Hellmann

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how generative AI reflects colonial biases in its visual outputs of Aotearoa New Zealand's history.
  • Case study of OpenAI's Sora
  • Analysis of AI-generated images from specific historical prompts
  • Utilization of iconographic methods
  • AI outputs reflect settler-colonial visual conventions
  • Depictions reinforce myths of benevolent colonization
  • Māori are portrayed as timeless and passive figures
  • The findings highlight the risk of perpetuating biased historical narratives

Abstract

This paper examines how generative artificial intelligence (AI) reproduces colonial visual tropes when tasked with representing Aotearoa New Zealand's historical past. Using OpenAI's Sora as a case study, the analysis investigates AI‐generated images prompted to depict (1) precolonial landscapes, (2) first contact between Māori and Europeans, (3) British colonial rule, and (4) Māori figures from the 1860s. Drawing on iconographic methods, the study finds that Sora‐generated outputs closely mirror dominant settler‐colonial visual conventions. These include portrayals of the land as terra nullius, colonisation as peaceful and consensual, and Māori as timeless, passive figures. Rather than offering disruptive alternatives, Sora reinforces hegemonic memory frameworks learned from biased training data. As generative AI tools become increasingly influential in shaping public understandings of the past, such depictions matter; they naturalise myths of benevolent colonisation and undermine Māori claims to political sovereignty, redress, and cultural revitalisation. The paper concludes by evaluating possible interventions at three stages of the AI development pipeline—preprocessing, model training, and postprocessing—while also highlighting the importance of AI literacy in enabling users to critically prompt and repurpose these technologies for decolonial ends.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Olli Hellmann (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6988277b0fc35cd7a88464f8https://doi.org/10.1002/kot2.70016
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Investigating Gender and Racial Biases in DALL-E Mini Images2024 · 54 citations
  2. 2Myths, Mascots, Monuments, and Massacres2023 · 3 citations
  3. 3Museums and Maori2016 · 15 citations
  4. 4Correction to: Excavating AI: the politics of images in machine learning training sets2021 · 142 citations
  5. 5Does Curriculum Fail Indigenous Political Aspirations? Sovereignty and Australian History and Social Studies Curriculum2023 · 9 citations