PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A storyline climate-change attribution study of the extreme hail event in Switzerland on 28 June 202

View Full Paper
RTRobert J. TrappSLSonia Lasher-TrappDCDuanne Claybrooke

Key Points

  • The research aims to assess how anthropogenic climate change influences extreme hail events, particularly one in Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Utilized a storyline approach to analyze an extreme hail event on June 28, 2021.
  • Simulated the event using the Weather Research and Forecasting model with ERA5 data.
  • Compared factual simulations with counter-factual simulations that excluded climate change signals.
  • Computed climate change signals using global climate model data from pre-industrial and current-day comparisons.
  • Counter-factual simulations showed significantly less hail compared to factual simulations.
  • Hail diameters of ≥ 3 cm were particularly impacted, showing a reduction in the counter-factual scenarios.
  • The area affected by larger hail sizes (> 3 cm and > 5 cm) increased due to climate change influences.

Abstract

We employed a “storyline” approach to explore possible anthropogenic climate change influences on the extreme hail event in Switzerland on 28 June 2021, with a particular focus on hailfall near Zurich, Switzerland. The event was successfully simulated using the weather research and forecasting model configured over a European regional domain, with initial and boundary conditions from ERA5. An ensemble of factual simulations with randomly perturbed initial and boundary conditions was compared to an ensemble of counter-factual simulations in which a mean climate change signal was removed from the initial and boundary conditions. This signal was computed using differences between global climate model (GCM) data averaged over current-day and pre-industrial time intervals; data from six different GCMs yielded a range of climate change signals, thus contributing to the counter-factual ensemble. Relative to factual simulations, counter-factual simulations exhibited overall less hail, particularly for diameters ≥ 3 cm. This tendency is consistent with relatively lower convective available potential energy but comparable melting depths in the counter-factual environments. We quantified the fraction of attributable risk and concluded that the geographical area covered by hail of diameter larger than 3 cm and 5 cm appears to have been increased by the meteorological changes attributable to climate change.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Trapp et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698827b40fc35cd7a8846a31https://doi.org/10.48620/94348
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper