PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

Optimal management of isolated left vertebral artery in total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk for aortic dissection

View Full Paper
SZS ZhouXSX G Sun

Key Points

  • This study seeks to identify the best management strategies for patients with isolated left vertebral artery undergoing total arch replacement for aortic dissection.
  • Retrospective analysis of 94 patients with isolated left vertebral artery and aortic dissection
  • Divided patients into three intervention groups: ligation, LSCA transposition, and LCCA transposition
  • Evaluated outcomes including vertebral artery dominance, paraplegia, and survival rates
  • Left vertebral artery dominance was found in 10.6% (left-dominant), 33.0% (symmetric), and 56.4% (right-dominant) of patients
  • No strokes occurred in any group during the study
  • No significant differences in paraplegia, mechanical ventilation time, or long-term survival among the three management strategies
  • Follow-up CTA confirmed patency of the left vertebral artery after transposition procedures

Abstract

Abstract Background The presence of an isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA) in patients with aortic dissection (AD) is a rare and challenging condition. This study aims to determine the optimal management of ILVA in patients with AD undergoing total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk (TAR with FET). Methods This retrospective study enrolled 94 patients with ILVA and AD who underwent TAR with FET. Patients were divided into three groups: 18 patients underwent ligation of ILVA, 52 underwent ILVA- left subclavian artery (LSCA) transposition, and 24 underwent ILVA- left commn carotid artery (LCCA) transposition. Results Vertebral artery dominance was left-dominant in 10.6%, symmetric in 33.0%, and right-dominant in 56.4% of patients. Notably, patients who underwent ligation of ILVA had either symmetric or right-dominant vertebral arteries, with no left-dominant cases. No strokes were observed. Paraplegia/paraparesis, mechanical ventilation time, and long-term survival were comparable among the three groups. Follow-up computed tomographic angiography (CTA) confirmed patency of the left vertebral artery in all patients who underwent ILVA transposition. Conclusions Ligation of ILVA, ILVA-LSCA transposition, and ILVA-LCCA transposition are all feasible and safe strategies for managing ILVA in patients with AD undergoing TAR with FET. However, ligation of ILVA is not recommended for patients with left-dominant vertebral arteries.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhou et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698827b40fc35cd7a8846ac4https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.2977
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper