The paper “Pre-hedging” studies a dealer that pre-hedges an anticipated potential trade and analyses how this affects the client’s overall execution outcome. It shows that pre-hedging can benefit both parties: Improved risk management over an extended horizon then enables the dealer to charge reduced spreads that more than offset any adverse impact the pre-hedging activity has on the execution price. However, when a dealer pre-hedges too aggressively, this can be detrimental to the client. Timing uncertainty of the potential trade is an effective control held by the client to mitigate any counterproductive pre-hedging. Our results are robust to a setting where competing dealers simultaneously pre-hedge.
Muhle‐Karbe et al. (2026) studied this question.