PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease0 citationsOpen Access

A Meta‐Analysis to Unveil the Diagnostic Gaps in Anderson–Fabry Disease in Women

View Full Paper
LLLivia LenziniGPG. PintusGGGiorgia Gugelmo

Key Points

  • This research aims to identify the diagnostic challenges of Anderson-Fabry disease in women and assess the effectiveness of current testing methods.
  • Conducted a meta-analysis of 67 studies focusing on female populations.
  • Evaluated diagnostic methodologies for AFD in women referred for cardiac, renal, or cerebrovascular events.
  • Analyzed prevalence rates based on different indications for testing and compared effectiveness of genetic versus enzymatic testing.
  • 114 out of 28,878 high-risk women screened were diagnosed with AFD, yielding a pooled prevalence of 0.007.
  • The highest AFD prevalence was found in women after stroke (0.014) compared to cardiac (0.010) and renal events (0.004).
  • Genetic testing showed a higher prevalence (0.012) compared to enzymatic protocols (0.003), highlighting its effectiveness.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Anderson–Fabry disease (AFD) is an X‐linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by mutations in the GLA gene, leading to deficient α‐galactosidase A activity. Although historically considered a male disease, it is now recognized that heterozygous women can present with a wide range of symptoms. However, diagnosis in women remains challenging, as enzymatic activity may be normal. A meta‐analysis of 67 studies was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of AFD in female populations referred for cardiac, renal, or cerebrovascular events of unknown etiology, focusing on current diagnostic methodologies. Out of 28 878 high‐risk women screened, 114 were diagnosed with AFD, yielding a pooled prevalence of 0.007 (95% CI 0.005–0.009). When considering the prevalence in the three main groups of indication for AFD testing (patients referred for cardiac, renal or cerebrovascular events of unknown etiology), the highest prevalence was found after a stroke (23 studies: 0.014, 95% CI 0.011–0.019), followed by cardiac event (19 studies: 0.010, 95% CI 0.007–0.015) and renal event (25 studies: 0.004, 95% CI 0.003–0.006). Genetic testing was significantly more effective in identifying cases (prevalence of AFD from 34 studies: 0.012, 95% CI 0.010–0.015) compared to enzymatic protocols (prevalence of AFD from 33 studies: 0.003, 95% CI 0.002–0.005). However, the reliance on enzymatic testing in some regions is still preferred. These findings underscore the limitations of relying solely on enzymatic assays in women and highlight the critical role of genetic testing in achieving accurate diagnosis. Early identification allows for timely treatment and enables family cascade screening, preventing further missed diagnoses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lenzini et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828b90fc35cd7a884882chttps://doi.org/10.1002/jimd.70153
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper