PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

Assessing coronary artery disease severity through transient ischemic dilation: evidence from MPS and SYNTAX scoring

View Full Paper
HLH A P LubisRTR M TambaZMZulfikri Mukhtar

Key Result

Transient Ischemic Dilation ratio was significantly higher in moderate-severe CAD (1.03±0.11) versus mild CAD (0.906±0.13), p<0.001, correlating with Syntax score.

Key Points

  • Evaluate the relationship between the TID ratio and CAD severity as measured by the Syntax score.
  • Retrospective cohort study of patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS).
  • Analyzed data from MPS using Tc-99m sestamibi and adenosine stress test.
  • Categorized patients into mild and moderate-severe CAD groups using Syntax scoring.
  • Performed bivariate analysis to assess relationships between TID and LV volumes.
  • 93 patients included, mean age 55.87 years.
  • Moderate-severe CAD group showed significantly higher TID values (1.03) compared to mild CAD group (0.906), p < 0.001.
  • TID ratio significantly correlated with LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes during stress (p = 0.001).

Structured PICO

Does the Transient Ischemic Dilation (TID) ratio on Myocardial Perfusion SPECT correlate with coronary artery disease severity as measured by the Syntax score in patients with chronic coronary syndrome?

P
Population
93 patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) who underwent Myocardial Perfusion SPECT (MPS) and coronary angiography, mean age 55.87 ± 7.44 years.
I
Intervention
Transient Ischemic Dilation (TID) ratio measurement derived from Myocardial Perfusion SPECT (MPS) using Tc-99m sestamibi with an adenosine pharmacologic stress test
C
Comparator
Mild CAD group versus Moderate-severe CAD group (categorized based on the Syntax score)
O
Outcome
Mean TID values compared between mild and moderate-severe CAD groupssurrogate

The Transient Ischemic Dilation (TID) ratio derived from Myocardial Perfusion SPECT strongly correlates with angiographic CAD severity, serving as a reliable non-invasive indicator of moderate-to-severe coronary artery disease.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The Transient Ischemic Dilation (TID) ratio, derived from the ratio of left ventricular (LV) volumes during stress and rest phases in Myocardial Perfusion SPECT (MPS), is a reliable marker of severe coronary artery disease (CAD). It reflects global myocardial hypoperfusion caused by extensive CAD and may manifest even in patients with atypical angina. Method This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) who underwent MPS using Tc-99m sestamibi with an adenosine pharmacologic stress test and coronary angiography between January 2022 and April 2023. MPS and angiography were performed in any sequence, provided no revascularization procedure occurred between the two examinations. Patients were categorized into mild and moderate-severe CAD groups based on the Syntax score. An unpaired t-test was conducted to compare mean TID values between groups. Results A total of 93 patients (mean age: 55.87 ± 7.44 years) were included. TID values were significantly higher in the moderate-severe CAD group compared to the mild CAD group (1.03 ± 0.11 vs. 0.906 ± 0.13; p 0.001). Bivariate analysis revealed that the TID ratio was significantly associated with LV end-systolic volume (ESV) and end-diastolic volume (EDV) during the stress phase of MPS (p = 0.001). Conclusion The TID ratio is strongly correlated with CAD severity, as determined by the Syntax score, with elevated values indicating moderate-to-severe CAD. This supports the concept that the TID ratio reflects LV volume changes during stress and rest phases and is proportional to the severity of myocardial hypoperfusion.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lubis et al. (2025) studied this question. Transient Ischemic Dilation ratio was significantly higher in moderate-severe CAD (1.03±0.11) versus mild CAD (0.906±0.13), p<0.001, correlating with Syntax score.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6988291e0fc35cd7a884925fhttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.302
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper