PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 20260 citations

Rethinking the modern and modernity with Jacob Taubes

View Full Paper
MKMonika Krause

Key Points

  • This paper examines Jacob Taubes' framework in 'Occidental Eschatology' to analyze modernity's relationship with religious concepts.
  • Analysis of cultural patterns in Taubes' writings
  • Examination of the distinction between 'world' and 'god' in the Hebrew Bible
  • Discussion of messianic thinking in relation to modernity
  • The concept of modernity is shown to be dissociated from specific historical or geographical contexts.
  • Messianic thinking is found to be integral to modernity instead of oppositional.
  • Competing worldviews contribute to instability and violence in modern contexts.

Abstract

Jacob Taubes' book "Occidental Eschatology" (1947) offers a unique framework for examining cultural patterns across the line often construed as separating “the religious” from the “non-religious.” This paper highlights the implications of the application of this framework for our understanding of modernity: With Taubes, the “modern” conception of history, totality and sovereignty can be traced to the emphatic distinction between “world” and “god” in the Hebrew Bible. In this perspective, “the modern” appears as a cultural element that is analytically dissociated from any particular later historical period and from any cultural or geographical context, such as “the West”. Messianic thinking appears integral to the modern rather than as a source of fundamentally opposing insights. Competing appeals to reject the world are a source of instability and violence in modernity. Further research can address how the modern is linked with other cultural elements and with institutional arrangements in different contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Monika Krause (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6988291e0fc35cd7a8849290https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764261424132
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper