A large drop in SpO₂ during showering (≥3.4%) doubled risk of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death (HR 2.02) over 1 year.
Does continuous SpO2 monitoring during showering predict heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure?
A drop in SpO2 of ≥3.4% during showering, measured by a waterproof wearable device, is a significant predictor of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death.
Abstract Introduction Assessment of exercise tolerance is crucial for predicting heart failure (HF) prognosis. While tests like the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) assess submaximal exercise load and provide prognostic information (1-3), their standardized conditions are difficult to replicate at home. Given the need for a reproducible load test, we explored whether routine activities could serve as an alternative. Showering, a common activity with a moderate load (2–3 METs) (4), often causes dyspnoea in HF patients. We investigated whether continuous SpO₂ monitoring during showering with a waterproof pulse oximeter could provide a reliable home-based assessment. Purpose This study aimed to examine the association between continuous SpO₂ changes during showering (ΔSpO₂-shw) and HF prognosis, and whether ΔSpO₂-shw could serve as a marker for predicting HF exacerbation. Methods In this prospective observational study, 65 patients hospitalized with acute HF were enrolled. Additionally, 12 non-HF patients admitted for pacemaker implantation or battery replacement served as controls. Prior to discharge, all participants underwent 24-hour continuous SpO₂ monitoring using a waterproof pulse oximeter (ATP-W03, Fukuda, Japan), which recorded SpO₂ every second during rest, showering, and the 6MWT. ΔSpO₂-shw was calculated by subtracting the average SpO₂ during showering from resting SpO₂. HF patients were followed for one year to assess a composite outcome of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death. Results Among HF patients, the mean age was 79.2 years; 49% were female; the mean ejection fraction was 47.2%; and the median NT-proBNP level was 2298 pg/ml. The average SpO₂ values were 95.7% at rest, 92.9% during the 6MWT, and 91.4% during showering. Both showering and 6MWT SpO₂ values were significantly lower than those at rest (p0.001), with showering SpO₂ significantly lower than 6MWT SpO₂ (p0.001) (Figure 1). The median ΔSpO₂-shw was 3.4%, and HF patients were stratified into small (3.4%) and large (≥3.4%) ΔSpO₂-shw groups. No significant differences were found in pulmonary function or echocardiographic data between these groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a higher cardiac event rate in the large ΔSpO₂-shw group (hazard ratio = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.01–4.09, p=0.047) (Figure 2). The control group had a significantly lower ΔSpO₂-shw (1.0% vs. 3.4%, p0.001). A strong correlation was observed between ΔSpO₂-shw and log NT-proBNP levels (n=77, r=0.548, p0.001). Conclusion Our findings suggest that ΔSpO₂-shw is a promising predictive marker for HF exacerbation. Continuous SpO₂ monitoring during routine activities like showering offers a practical and reproducible way to assess exercise tolerance at home, potentially enhancing HF management by enabling early detection of disease progression.Changes in SpO₂ levels Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Cardiac Events
Sunayama et al. (2025) studied this question. A large drop in SpO₂ during showering (≥3.4%) doubled risk of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death (HR 2.02) over 1 year.