Mapping Executive Function Performance Based on Resting-State EEG in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic and Mechanistic Review

Introduction: Resting-state EEG (rsEEG) is a scalable window onto trait-like “executive readiness,” but findings have been fragmented by task impurity on the executive-function (EF) side and heterogeneous EEG pipelines. This review synthesizes rsEEG features that reliably track EF in healthy samples across development and aging and evaluates moderators such as cognitive reserve. Materials and methods: Following PRISMA 2020, we defined PECOS-based eligibility (human participants; eyes-closed/eyes-open rsEEG; spectral, aperiodic, connectivity, topology, microstate, and LRTC features; behavioral EF outcomes) and searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore from inception to 30 August 2025. Two reviewers were screened/double-extracted; the risk of bias in non-randomized studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Sixty-three studies met criteria (plus citation tracking), spanning from childhood to old age. Results: Across domains, tempo, noise, and wiring jointly explained EF differences. Faster individual/peak alpha frequency (IAF/PAF) related most consistently to manipulation-heavy working may and interference control/vigilance in aging; alpha power was less informative once periodic and aperiodic components were separated. Aperiodic 1/f parameters (slope/offset) indexed domain-general efficiency (processing speed, executive composites) with education-dependent sign flips in later life. Connectivity/topology outperformed local power: efficient, small-world-like alpha networks predicted faster, more consistent decisions and higher WM accuracy, whereas globally heightened alpha/gamma synchrony—and rigid high-beta organization—were behaviorally sluggish. Within-frontal beta/gamma coherence supported span maintenance/sequencing, but excessive fronto-posterior theta coherence selectively undermined WM manipulation/updating. A higher frontal theta/beta ratio forecasts riskier, less adaptive choices and poorer reversal learning for decision policy. Age and reserve consistently moderated effects (e.g., child frontal theta supportive for WM; older-adult slow power often detrimental; stronger EO ↔ EC connectivity modulation and faster alpha with higher reserve). Boundary conditions were common: low-load tasks and homogeneous young samples usually yielded nulls. Conclusions: RsEEG does not diagnose EF independently; single-band metrics or simple ratios lack specificity and can be confounded by age/reserve. Instead, a multi-feature signature—faster alpha pace, steeper 1/f slope with appropriate offset, efficient/flexible alpha-band topology with limited global over-synchrony (especially avoiding long-range theta lock), and supportive within-frontal fast-band coherence—best captures individual differences in executive speed, interference control, stability, and WM manipulation. For reproducible applications, recordings should include ≥5–6 min eyes-closed (plus eyes-open), ≥32 channels, vigilant artifact/drowsiness control, periodic–aperiodic decomposition, lag-insensitive connectivity, and graph metrics; analyses must separate speed from accuracy and distinguish WM maintenance vs. manipulation. Clinical translation should prioritize stratification and monitoring (not diagnosis), interpreted through the lenses of development, aging, and cognitive reserve.