PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 9, 2026Medical and Veterinary Entomology1 citationsOpen Access

Mosquito and arbovirus surveillance in wetlands of South‐East England: Comparison of two adult mosquito traps, use of a novel trap with FTA ™ cards and arbovirus testing

View Full Paper
AVAlexander G. C. VauxHHHarrison HardyLCLucy Crossley

Key Points

  • To assess the effectiveness of different mosquito traps in capturing diverse mosquito species and detecting arboviruses in wetlands.
  • Evaluated two adult mosquito traps (BGS and MM) over 12 weeks in four wetlands.
  • Deployed a Box-Gravid trap with FTA™ cards for arbovirus detection.
  • Collected a total of 11,584 adult female mosquitoes of 15 species.
  • MM trap captured significantly more mosquitoes overall.
  • BGS trap showed greater species evenness and effectively caught Culex pipiens.
  • No WNV detected in any mosquito pools or FTA™ cards.

Abstract

Abstract Effective surveillance of mosquito populations is critical to monitoring and mitigating the spread of mosquito‐borne diseases (MBDs). This study evaluated the relative trapping efficiency of two widely used adult mosquito traps—the Biogents BG‐Sentinel (BGS) and the Mosquito Magnet® Executive (MM)—on British mosquitoes across four wetlands in south‐east England over a 12‐week period. A third trap, a Box‐Gravid trap fitted with an FTA™ card, was deployed to detect arboviruses such as West Nile virus (WNV) via saliva collection. A total of 11,584 adult female mosquitoes representing 15 species were collected. The MM trap captured a significantly higher total number of mosquitoes, while the BGS trap demonstrated greater species evenness and was significantly more effective at catching Culex ( Culex ) pipiens L., 1758. Spatial variation strongly influenced catch rates, with significant differences between wetlands. No evidence of WNV was detected in any mosquito pools or FTA™ cards. While both trap types yielded similar species richness, the MM trap may be optimal for collecting large sample sizes of mammalophagic species, whereas the BGS is better suited for capturing enzootic vectors such as Culex pipiens s.l. , and a broader spectrum of species. These findings provide evidence‐based recommendations for future UK wetland surveillance and enhance preparedness for emerging vector‐borne disease risks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vaux et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69897996f0ec2af6756e752bhttps://doi.org/10.1111/mve.70053
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper