PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 9, 2026Sci0 citationsOpen Access

Governing Healthcare AI in the Real World: How Fairness, Transparency, and Human Oversight Can Coexist: A Narrative Review

PBPaolo BailoGNGiulio NittariGPGiuliano Pesel

Key Points

  • This review aims to explore how fairness, transparency, and human oversight can coexist in healthcare AI governance.
  • Narrative review of peer-reviewed studies and policy frameworks
  • Analysis of seven aspects: bias, explainability, privacy, accountability, human oversight, and procurement
  • Integration of findings about existing gaps and best practices in AI governance
  • Identified persistent inequities from dataset bias and opaque AI designs
  • Highlighted the need for effective explainability tools for clinicians
  • Emphasized the importance of post-market surveillance for patient safety
  • Proposed that emerging liability models should encourage shared responsibility among stakeholders

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly shifting from experimental pilots to mainstream clinical infrastructure, redefining how evidence, accountability, and ethics intersect in healthcare. This narrative review integrates insights from peer-reviewed studies and policy frameworks to examine seven cross-cutting aspects: bias and fairness, explainability, safety and quality, privacy and data protection, accountability and liability, human oversight, and procurement and deployment. Findings reveal persistent inequities driven by dataset bias and opaque design; the need for explainability tools that are validated, task-specific, and usable by clinicians; and the centrality of post-market surveillance for sustaining patient safety. Privacy-preserving methods such as federated learning and differential privacy show promise but demand rigorous validation and regulatory coherence. Emerging liability models advocate shared enterprise responsibility, while governance-by-design—embedding transparency, auditability, and equity across the AI lifecycle—appears most effective in balancing innovation with public trust. Ethical, legal, and technical safeguards must evolve together to ensure that AI augments, rather than replaces, clinical judgment and institutional accountability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bailo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698979b9f0ec2af6756e795chttps://doi.org/10.3390/sci8020036
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper