PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 9, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Analysis of the Shear Strength of Expansive Soil Stabilized with Sand and Coal Bottom Ash Columns

View Full Paper
SPSanzida ParvinMHMd. Ikramul HoqueJAJhumana Akter

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the impact of sand and coal bottom ash columns on the shear strength of expansive soil.
  • Conducted unconfined compression strength tests on soil samples.
  • Prepared 19 batches of soil samples including control and various column types.
  • Tested different column diameters (16 mm, 19 mm, 25 mm) at varying heights (60 mm, 80 mm, 100 mm).
  • Sand columns improved shear strength by 25% to 76%.
  • Coal bottom ash columns enhanced shear strength by 30% to 88%.
  • Column size and placement significantly affected the strength improvement.

Abstract

Soil stabilization refers to a range of techniques and methods used to upgrade the engineering properties of soil, transforming it from an unconsolidated state into a more reliable medium. Expansive soils can cause serious problems, such as cracks and building damage, because they swell and shrink with moisture changes. One common solution is using granular columns. This research aims to determine the effect of sand and coal bottom ash (CBA) columns on expansive soil. The Unconfined Compression Strength (UCS) was used to measure the improvements. There was a total of 19 batches of soil samples, which consisted of one control sample and six batches each of 16 mm, 19 mm, and 25 mm diameter sand and CBA columns. Columns of each diameter were tested at heights of 60 mm, 80 mm, and 100 mm. All soil samples measured 50 mm in diameter and 100 mm in height. The results showed that sand columns increased shear strength by 25% to 76%, while CBA columns gave even better results, with a 30% to 88% improvement, depending on the size and depth of the column. Overall, the study shows that both sand and CBA columns can make expansive soils stronger, with CBA being more effective. The size and placement of the columns play an important role in improving soil strength.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Parvin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698979d9f0ec2af6756e7cf1https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202607_30.012
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparative Evaluation of Shear Strength Enhancement in Soft Clay Reinforced with Sand and Stone Dust Column2025
  2. 2Engineering Properties of Expansive Clay Soils with Sustainable Stabilization Methods2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3The Comparison between the Strength of Stabilized Cement Clay Columns and Remolded Cement Clay Samples2023
  4. 4Strength and stiffness of DSM columns in clayey/sandy soils: analytical, experimental, and full-scale field-based investigations2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Shear Strength of Soft Soil Reinforced with Singular Bottom Ash Column2024 · 11 citations