PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 9, 20260 citationsOpen Access

CMRI-detected brain injuries and clinical key risk factors associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in very preterm infants

View Full Paper
KDKarla DrommelschmidtTMThomas MayrhoferHMHanna Müller

Key Points

  • Evaluate the impact of cMRI-detected brain injuries and clinical risk factors on neurodevelopmental outcomes in very preterm infants.
  • Retrospective analysis conducted on 342 very preterm infants born < 32 weeks gestation.
  • Analyzed perinatal and neonatal risk factors related to brain injuries, motor, and cognitive outcomes.
  • Utilized uni-/multivariable regression models for statistical assessments.
  • Significant clinical predictors include gestational age, birthweight, APGAR score, and others.
  • Multiple brain injury types, even mild, were linked to adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes.
  • Key factors identified include severe brain injuries, APGAR scores, and surfactant treatment influencing outcomes.

Abstract

Neurological impairment is high after preterm birth. This study evaluates the impact and interplay of cMRI-detected brain injuries (BI) and clinical risk factors on neurodevelopmental outcomes and extracts the most important key factors. A retrospective analysis was conducted on risk factors (perinatal/neonatal, cMRI-detected BI) for adverse motor (MO) and cognitive (CO) outcomes (Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 24 months corrected age) in a tertiary center cohort (2009-2018) of very preterm infants ( 1, all p 1 severe cMRI-detected BI (MO/CO:-11.27/-10.3 score points (sp), p = 0.021/0.043), APGAR score (10 min, MO/CO:+5.3/+4.45 sp/point, p < 0.001/p < 0.001), surfactant administration (MO:+4.88 sp, p = 0.031), and transfusion of RBCs (MO/CO:-1.69/-1.96 sp/transfusion, p = 0.006/p < 0.001). In conclusion, combining imaging and clinical (key) risk factors is important for risk stratification of preterm infants. Even mild BI, like IVH II°, significantly contributes to adverse outcomes, underlining the importance of cMRI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Drommelschmidt et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698979e9f0ec2af6756e7ed7https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-291015
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Associations of brain MRI and perinatal factors with 2-year neurodevelopment in very preterm infants2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Multivariate risk assessment and analysis of brain injury in high-risk infants in neonatal intensive care unit2026
  3. 3The Association between Ventricle Ratio in Preterm Infants and Motor Developmental Delay2024
  4. 4Early neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants with intraventricular haemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia2024 · 17 citations
  5. 5Developing and Validating a Machine Learning Model to Predict Brain Injury in Preterm Infants Using Multisource Data from the Early Postnatal Period2026