PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 9, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Logical Cost of the Thermodynamic Limit: LPO-Equivalence and BISH-Dispensability for the 1D Ising Free Energy — A Lean 4 Formalization

View Full Paper
PLPaul Chun-Kit Lee

Key Points

  • The aim is to establish the relationship between the thermodynamic limit and the Limited Principle of Omniscience in a constructive mathematical context.
  • Formalization of results in Lean 4 using Mathlib
  • Prove finite-size error bounds constructively without omniscience
  • Demonstrate equivalence between the existence of thermodynamic limit and LPO under BISH
  • Proven error bound for finite-size Ising model is available without omniscience principles.
  • Thermodynamic limit exists as a real number, equivalent to LPO in constructive math.
  • LPO cost of thermodynamic limit is genuine and dispensable.

Abstract

We prove two complementary results about the thermodynamic limit of the one-dimensional Ising model, formalized in Lean 4 with Mathlib. (A) Dispensability. The finite-size error bound |fN (β) − f_∞ (β) | ≤ (1/N) tanh (β) N is provable in Bishop-style constructive mathematics (BISH) without any omniscience principle. A constructive witness N₀ for any prescribed accuracy ε > 0 is explicitly computed. (B) Calibration. The existence of the thermodynamic limit as a completed real number is equivalent over BISH to the Limited Principle of Omniscience (LPO), via the known equivalence between LPO and bounded monotone convergence (Bridges–Vîță 2006) instantiated through the Ising free energy function g (J) = −log (2 cosh (βJ) ). Together, these results establish that the LPO cost of the thermodynamic limit is genuine (it is equivalent to, not merely sufficient for, a known omniscience principle) and dispensable (the empirical content requires no omniscience). The archive contains: 18 Lean 4 source files (1374 lines total, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 sorries) LaTeX source and compiled PDF (17 pages) Build instructions (ZENODOREADME. md) Axiom profile: Part A and the backward direction of Part B use only Lean's foundational axioms propext, Classical. choice, Quot. sound. The forward direction (LPO → BMC) is axiomatized citing Bridges–Vîță 2006. This is Paper 8 in a constructive reverse mathematics series. Companion papers: Paper 2 (WLPO ↔ bidual gap in ℓ¹), Paper 7 (WLPO via trace-class non-reflexivity). Keywords: constructive mathematics reverse mathematics Ising model thermodynamic limit Limited Principle of Omniscience bounded monotone convergence Lean 4 formal verification interactive theorem proving mathematical physics statistical mechanics free energy Bishop-style constructive analysis

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Paul Chun-Kit Lee (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698979e9f0ec2af6756e7ffehttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18516812
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper