PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 9, 2026Journal of Medicinal Chemistry0 citationsOpen Access

Cellular Context Influences Kinase Inhibitor Selectivity

View Full Paper
MBM. BinderFBFrances M. BashoreKHKaitlin K. Dunn Hoffman

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the selectivity of kinase inhibitors using different assay systems and to identify their interactions in cellular contexts.
  • Compared selectivity profiling results from cell-free assays with cellular target engagement assays.
  • Utilized a panel of ten kinase inhibitors for systematic comparison.
  • Employed NanoBRET assays to evaluate cellular selectivity.
  • Characterized TPKI-39 based on its in-cell selectivity profile.
  • Identified divergent results between cell-free and cellular assay systems.
  • Unanticipated kinase interactions were found for type II inhibitors in cells.
  • TPKI-39 was characterized as a probe for DDR1, DDR2, and FLT1 based on cellular selectivity.

Abstract

A pivotal part of kinase chemical probe and drug development is assessment of the selectivity of a putative lead compound. While there is no consensus around the panel size or the type of assay(s) that are most appropriate, there is concurrence that gauging the number of on- and off-targets of a kinase inhibitor is essential. As pharmacology takes place in cells, we have compared profiling results for ten kinase inhibitors generated using the cell-free assays to those obtained when a panel of cellular target engagement NanoBRET assays is used to assess selectivity in intact cells. This is the first systematic comparison of these two approaches across a broad kinase panel. Comparison of the data sets demonstrates divergent results that can influence chemical probe prioritization. We identify unanticipated kinase interactions in cells for type II kinase inhibitors that are not observed in biochemical, cell-free systems. Furthermore, we characterize TPKI-39 as a DDR1, DDR2, and FLT1 chemical probe based on its in-cell selectivity profile.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Binder et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698979f5f0ec2af6756e81bahttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5c02916
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper