PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 9, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Long-Term Outcome of Ciclosporin and Infliximab as Rescue Therapy in Steroid-Refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

View Full Paper
FGFlorian GrobIHIsabel HäberlingGNGottfried Novacek

Key Points

  • To evaluate the long-term outcomes of ciclosporin and infliximab in patients with steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis.
  • Conducted a retrospective analysis of patients at a tertiary center in Switzerland.
  • Analyzed colectomy-free survival rates using Kaplan-Meier method at 1, 3, and 5 years.
  • Assessed predictors of colectomy, adverse events, and mortality during follow-up.
  • 78%, 67%, and 48% of patients were colectomy-free at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively.
  • 13% of patients received a second rescue therapy.
  • No significant difference in colectomy-free survival between infliximab and ciclosporin.

Abstract

Background: Ciclosporin and infliximab have equal short-term efficacy in treating acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). However, data about long-term outcome and switching to a second rescue therapy are limited. Methods: Patients with steroid-refractory ASUC treated at a tertiary center in Switzerland were retrospectively analyzed regarding the outcome of different rescue therapies. Colectomy-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were estimated through Kaplan-Meier method. Furthermore, predictors of colectomy, the presence of adverse events at 1 year and mortality during the entire follow-up were assessed. Results: We analyzed a total of 46 patients who were treated initially with either ciclosporin ( = 31) or infliximab ( = 15) due to steroid-refractory ASUC between January 2010 and July 2021. A total of 13% patients received a second rescue therapy. In sum, 78%, 67%, and 48% were colectomy-free at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Although there was a significant difference between the three arms in colectomy-free survival ( = 0.026), a post hoc analysis could not demonstrate a difference between each individual therapy compared to another. The post hoc analysis indicated a nonsignificant benefit with sequential therapy in comparison to ciclosporin (CsA) regarding the colectomy-free survival ( = 0.087). The outcome between infliximab and CsA was not statistically different ( = 0.149). The number of previous advanced therapies was negatively associated with 1-year colectomy-free survival ( = 0.049). Other variables such as age at hospitalization, sex, dose of steroids, disease duration, and albumin did not correlate with a higher risk of 1-year colectomy. Conclusions: This real-world single-center analysis confirms the equal efficacy and safety of infliximab and ciclosporin over a follow-up of 5 years. Patients not responding to the first may benefit of a second rescue therapy without increasing the risk of complication or mortality.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Grob et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69897a06f0ec2af6756e82b0https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-291052
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effectiveness and safety of a third‐line rescue treatment for acute severe ulcerative colitis refractory to infliximab or ciclosporin ( REASUC study)2024 · 27 citations
  2. 2Short- and longevity outcome of cyclosporin rescue therapy in severe ulcerative colitis refractory to intravenous corticosteroid treatment2025
  3. 3Early infliximab rescue therapy is associated with reduced length of stay in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis2026
  4. 4Comparison of Tacrolimus and Infliximab for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in Hospitalized Adults: A Retrospective Study2026
  5. 5Corticosteroid therapy following infliximab rescue in acute severe ulcerative colitis: should they be continued?2026