PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 9, 2026Trusts & Trustees0 citations

“Who then is my child?”

View Full Paper
JRJohn Rimmer

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how changing definitions of 'child' affect legal documentation and drafting.
  • Analyzed historical and contemporary definitions of 'child'
  • Examined implications of adoption, IVF, surrogacy, and same-sex marriage
  • Identified challenges in legal drafting for wills and trusts
  • Noted significant changes in societal and legal definitions of 'child'
  • Highlighted complexities in drafting documents regarding child status
  • Emphasized the need for clarity in legal language to avoid ambiguities

Abstract

Abstract It is easy to make assumptions about who is, and who is not, the “child” of an individual. In the past, the main question was whether someone was the legitimate child of another. As society and technology have changed, the meaning of “child” has changed to accommodate such matters as adoption, IVF, surrogacy, and same sex marriage. This presents legal issues for those faced with the wording of a will or trust that depends on whether an individual is the “child” of another: how to draft so that someone’s status as a “child” of another is made clear, and how to approach the question of whether custom, an older legal document, or legislation might influence what is open to the draftsman. This article highlights some of the issues to help the draftsman be alert to them and address them accordingly.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

John Rimmer (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69897a06f0ec2af6756e838fhttps://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttaf101
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper