PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 9, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Ergonomic Benefits of Prismatic Deflection Loupes in Ophthalmic Surgery: A Biomechanical and Psychometric Evaluation

View Full Paper
JWJenny N. WangBNBrian NgoSDSusan Dalton

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the ergonomic benefits of prismatic deflection loupes in comparison to traditional loupes and no loupe during ophthalmic microsurgery.
  • Ten medical students performed microsuturing tasks using PDLs, TTL, and no loupes.
  • Surface electromyography recorded upper trapezius muscle activity.
  • A 10-point Likert survey assessed comfort and perceptions post-task.
  • Craniovertebral angles were measured to estimate cervical spine loading using a trigometric model.
  • PDLs reduced upper trapezius activation by 17.2% compared to TTL (p = 0.009).
  • Significant reductions in muscle activity were observed with PDLs compared to no loupe (p = 0.004).
  • No significant difference in muscle activity existed between TTL and no-loupe conditions (p = 0.42).
  • Comfort scores were highest for PDLs with an average rating of 7.8/10.
  • A strong inverse correlation was found between CV angle and estimated cervical load (R2 = 0.94, p < 0.001).

Abstract

Prismatic deflection loupes (PDLs) may offer ergonomic benefits over traditional through-the-lens (TTL) loupes and no loupe during ophthalmic microsurgery. Ten medical students performed microsuturing tasks under three conditions: PDL, TTL, and no loupes. Surface electromyography (EMG) captured bilateral upper trapezius activity, and a post-task 10-point Likert survey assessed comfort and related perceptions. Side-profile photos provided craniovertebral angles, which fed a trigometric model to estimate cervical spine loading (lbf) per condition. Relative to TTL, PDLs reduced upper trapezius activation by 17.2% (p = 0.009); relative to no loupe, PDL reductions were significant (p = 0.004). The TTL and no-loupe conditions did not differ significantly (p = 0.42). Comfort was highest for PDLs (7.8/10 on average); perceived strain was lowest with PDLs. CV angle and estimated cervical load were strongly inversely correlated (R2 = 0.94, p < 0.001). PDLs appear to reduce neck/shoulder muscle activity and cervical loading while enhancing comfort, supporting ergonomic value in ophthalmic surgery.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69897a06f0ec2af6756e83a6https://doi.org/10.3390/safety12010024
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper