PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 9, 2026Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry1 citationsOpen Access

Comparative thermal analysis of heat transfer fluid injection orientation in phase change material based latent heat thermal energy storage systems

SDSana DardouriBMBendida MedjahedMAMüslüm Arıcı

Key Points

  • To evaluate how heat exchanger orientation and heat transfer fluid injection direction influence thermal performance in LHTES systems.
  • Conducted experiments with horizontal and vertical double-pipe heat exchanger configurations.
  • Varied HTF injection direction (top and bottom) while monitoring temperature evolution and flow rate.
  • Measured charging and discharging durations, heat transfer coefficients, and Nusselt numbers.
  • Top injection facilitates faster charging, raising PCM average temperatures.
  • Bottom injection enhances convective heat transfer, leading to higher Nusselt numbers and heat transfer coefficients.
  • Increasing flow rate from 60 to 120 L h −1 reduces charging time by 14.2%, from 70 to 60 minutes.
  • Discharge performance shows reductions of 8.9% for horizontal, 43.3% for bottom injection, and 42.6% for top injection at consistent flow rates.

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to experimentally investigate the influence of heat exchanger orientation and heat transfer fluid (HTF) injection direction on the thermal performance of a latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) system using a phase change material (PCM). A comparative analysis is conducted between horizontal and vertical double-pipe heat exchanger configurations, considering both top and bottom injection of the HTF. The experimental methodology involves systematic variations of inlet temperature and volumetric flow rate while monitoring temperature evolution, charging and discharging durations, heat transfer coefficients, and Nusselt numbers. The results demonstrate that the direction of HTF injection plays a critical role in governing heat transfer behavior. Top injection promotes faster charging by enabling the PCM to reach higher average temperatures, whereas bottom injection enhances convective heat transfer, yielding the highest Nusselt numbers and heat transfer coefficients, albeit with longer charging and discharging times. In the horizontal configuration, increasing the flow rate from 60 to 120 L h −1 reduces the charging time from 70 to 60 min, corresponding to an improvement of 14.2%. Discharge tests performed at inlet temperatures of 70 °C and 80 °C reveal performance reductions of 8.9% for the horizontal configuration, 43.3% for bottom injection, and 42.6% for top injection at a constant flow rate. Overall, the horizontal configuration exhibits the fastest thermal response during both charging and discharging processes, while bottom injection achieves the highest thermal efficiency. These findings highlight the importance of heat exchanger orientation and flow direction optimization for improving the performance of LHTES systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dardouri et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69897a14f0ec2af6756e85fchttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-026-15288-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Experimental investigation and CFD modelling analysis of finned-tube PCM heat exchanger for space heating2024 · 67 citations
  2. 2A Parametric Study on The Performance of Latent Heat Thermal Energy Storage2025
  3. 3Effect of steam flow parameters on the partial load behaviour of a PCM storage2024 · 6 citations
  4. 4Advanced Fin Design for Efficient Heat Transfer in Double‐Pipe Latent Heat Thermal Storage: A Comparative Study of Straight and Inclined Multielement Fins2026
  5. 5Performance Evaluation of Nanoparticle Dispersed Phase Change Material Charging in Thermal Energy Storage System Featuring Longitudinal Fins2026