PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 9, 20260 citations

Comparison of Implant-Supported Permanent Crowns Produced wıth Different 3D Printed Resins in Terms of Productıon Accuracy, Marginal Fit and Internal Fit: A Comparative in Vitro Study.

View Full Paper
THTugba HergunerFCFaruk CilesizDDDerya Ozdemir Dogan

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the production accuracy and fit of implant-supported crowns made from different 3D printed resins.
  • Comparative in vitro design
  • Assessment of accuracy, marginal fit, and internal fit
  • Use of different 3D printed resins
  • Additive resins offered better retention and internal fit.
  • Subtractive materials provided superior surface accuracy.

Abstract

Case-specific material choice is essential. Each material has distinct advantages and limitations. Additive resins may be preferred where retention and internal fit are critical, while subtractive materials are suitable when surface accuracy is prioritized.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Herguner et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69897a25f0ec2af6756e877chttps://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9569
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper