PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Energy Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Investigation on Oxide Nanofluid‐Based Spectrally Selective Filters for Photovoltaic/Thermal Solar Receiver

View Full Paper
NZNing ZhangQYQiang YangYFYijun Fu

Key Points

  • To explore the impact of oxide nanofluids on the optical and thermal performance of hybrid PVT solar receivers.
  • Applied SiO2, TiO2, Fe3O4, and ZnO oxide nanofluids in experiments.
  • Varied nanoparticle mass loading from 0.0001 to 0.05 wt%.
  • Measured optical properties and electrical/thermal outputs.
  • Optical transmittance decreased with increased mass loading.
  • Maximum transmittance for ZnO reached 72.26%.
  • ZnO nanofluid exhibited the highest filter efficiency of 40.83% and comprehensive efficiency of 78.42%.

Abstract

In this work, SiO 2 , TiO 2 , Fe 3 O 4 , and ZnO oxide‐nanofluids as selectively absorbing fluids were applied for spectral beam splitting hybrid PVT solar receiver. The full spectrum is divided into photovoltaic/thermal two parts to decouple the collection temperature is limited by the operating temperature of the photovoltaic cell. The effect of nanoparticle mass loading from 0.0001 to 0.05 wt% on the optical property and electrical/thermal output performance of the PV/T system were experimental studied. The results indicated the optical transmittance of nanofiltering liquid decrease with accumulation of mass loading, and the average transmittance at the spectral response range of monocrystalline cell reaches the maximum of 66.15%, 66.93%, 70.51%, and 72.26% for SiO 2 , TiO 2 , Fe 3 O 4 , and ZnO nanofiltering liquid, respectively. The maximum filter efficiencies of SiO 2 , TiO 2 , Fe 3 O 4 , and ZnO nanofluids are 34.87%, 19.68%, 32.28%, and 40.83%, correspondingly the comprehensive efficiency are 74.78%, 69.27%, 73.91%, and 78.42%, respectively. It is concluded that the ZnO nanofiltering liquid exhibits optimal filter efficiency and its comprehensive efficiency is 78.42% when the mass loading is 0.005 wt%, implying well‐matched with monocrystalline cell.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1bff267fb587c655e124https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.202501899
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Experimental investigation of a TiO2 nanofluid spectral beam-splitting photovoltaic-thermal system under outdoor conditions2026
  2. 2Spectral‐Splitting Photovoltaic‐Thermal Solar Collectors Using Selective Hybrid Liquid‐Solid Optical Filters2026 · 2 citations
  3. 3Spectral‐Splitting Photovoltaic‐Thermal Solar Collectors Using Selective Hybrid Liquid‐Solid Optical Filters2026
  4. 4Nanofluids for High-Efficiency PV/T Systems: A Comprehensive Numerical Assessment2026
  5. 5Novel design and performance analysis of a selectively filtered nanofluid spectrum semi-trough solar concentrated photovoltaic/thermal system2024