PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases0 citations

Integrating Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and Serological Markers to Optimize Acute Gouty Arthritis Diagnosis

View Full Paper
XZXiao-Jian ZongLLLei LiuMYMao Yang

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the effectiveness of combining musculoskeletal ultrasound with serum markers for diagnosing acute gouty arthritis.
  • Evaluated 112 hospitalized gouty arthritis patients from February 2021 to February 2022
  • Classified patients into acute gouty arthritis and non-acute gouty arthritis groups
  • Compared musculoskeletal ultrasound scores and serum levels of HIF-1α and COX-2 between groups
  • Utilized Disease Activity Score-28 to further analyze the acute gouty arthritis subgroup's activity levels
  • MSUS scores, DAS28, and serum levels of HIF-1α and COX-2 were significantly higher in the acute gouty arthritis group compared to the non-acute group
  • The high-activity subgroup exhibited increased MSUS and serum levels compared to the low-activity subgroup
  • Positive correlations were found between MSUS scores, serum HIF-1α, COX-2 levels, and DAS28 scores
  • Combined use of MSUS and serum markers improved diagnostic accuracy and disease activity assessment for acute gouty arthritis.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of combining musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) with serum levels of hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1α (HIF‐1α) and cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2) for acute gouty arthritis (AGA). Methods The study included 112 patients hospitalized for gouty arthritis between February 2021 and February 2022. Of these, 60 patients presented with AGA, while 62 had non‐acute gouty arthritis (NAGA). Semi‐quantitative musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) scores and serum levels of hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1α (HIF‐1α) and cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2) were compared between the two groups. A Disease Activity Score‐28 (DAS28) was used to further classify the AGA group into low‐activity and high‐activity subgroups. Results MSUS scores, DAS28, and serum levels of HIF‐1α and COX‐2 were significantly elevated in the AGA group compared to the NAGA group ( p < 0.05). Furthermore, within the AGA group, the high‐activity subgroup exhibited higher MSUS semi‐quantitative scores, DAS28 scores, and serum levels of HIF‐1α and COX‐2 compared to the low‐activity subgroup ( p < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between the MSUS semi‐quantitative score and serum levels of HIF‐1α, COX‐2, as well as the DAS28 score in patients diagnosed with AGA ( p < 0.05). The combined application of MSUS semi‐quantitative scoring and serological markers provided significantly enhanced diagnostic accuracy for AGA and better assessment of disease activity compared to any individual marker. Conclusions MSUS and serum HIF‐1α and COX‐2 represent valuable tools for assessing the acute phase and disease activity of AGA. The combined diagnostic approach demonstrates superior effectiveness and holds potential for broader clinical application.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1bff267fb587c655e1aehttps://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.70564
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper