PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society1 citationsOpen Access

Neurocognitive outcomes in survivors of ALL: Risk patterns and individual profiles in a single-protocol cohort

BNBarbara NordhjemLALiv Andrés-JensenKCKristian Mielke Christensen

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess cognitive functioning in survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated under a specific protocol.
  • Eighty-three survivors of ALL diagnosed before age 25 were evaluated.
  • Neurocognitive testing was conducted at a median of 7.24 years post-treatment.
  • Performance was measured using age-standardized Z scores from normative data.
  • Multiple linear regression analyzed associations between cognitive outcomes and clinical risk factors.
  • At least 38.6% of participants showed severe impairment in one or more cognitive domains.
  • Younger age at diagnosis correlated with poorer processing speed, executive functions, and non-verbal reasoning.
  • Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was linked to poorer processing speed and non-verbal reasoning.

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Increasing survival probabilities among children and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have led to a growing population at risk for long-term neurocognitive sequelae. This study investigated cognitive functioning among individuals treated for ALL under the Nordic Society of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology ALL2008 protocol in Eastern Denmark, including performance across multiple domains and associations with age at diagnosis, sex, time since end of treatment, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and neurotoxic events during treatment. Method: Eighty-three survivors of ALL diagnosed before age 25 underwent neurocognitive testing at a median of 7.24 years post-treatment (interquartile range: 4.20–8.78). Performance was measured as age-standardized Z scores derived from normative data. Impairment was defined as Z ≤ −1.3 and severe impairment as Z ≤ −2.0. Multiple linear regression was used to investigate associations between cognitive outcomes and clinical risk factors. Results: Average performance was generally comparable to norms, but at least 38.6% of participants showed severe impairment in one or more domains, and at least 12% in two or more. Younger age at diagnosis was associated with poorer processing speed, executive functions, and non-verbal reasoning, while HSCT was associated with poorer processing speed and non-verbal reasoning. Conclusions: Although average performance of the participants was generally comparable to norms, a notable proportion exhibited multi-domain, severe cognitive impairment. Associations with age at diagnosis and HSCT indicate potential for risk-stratified cognitive monitoring and targeted interventions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nordhjem et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1bff267fb587c655e240https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617726101829
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper