PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Journal of Marine Science and Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Analysis of Performance and Emissions of a Two-Stroke Marine Diesel Engine According to CPP Modes

JMJaesung Moon

Key Points

  • The aim is to compare performance and emissions of a two-stroke marine diesel engine operated with different controllable pitch propeller modes.
  • Conducted full-scale measurements on T/S Baek-Kyung with a MAN B&W engine under IMO Tier II conditions.
  • Compared two CPP control strategies: constant-speed and combinator modes.
  • Analyzed engine performance across a load range of 25-75% SMCR, focusing on specific fuel consumption and emissions.
  • Combinator mode improved fuel efficiency, reducing SFOC by up to 10.5 g/kWh at 25% load.
  • Shaft torque increased by up to 47% under the combinator mode.
  • Higher estimated emissions at low load, with BSNOx increasing from 13.61 to 16.95 g/kWh.

Abstract

This study experimentally investigates the performance and exhaust emission characteristics of a low-speed two-stroke marine diesel engine operated with different controllable pitch propeller (CPP) modes during actual sea operation. Full-scale measurements were conducted on the training vessel T/S Baek-Kyung, equipped with a MAN B&W 5S35ME-B9.5 engine, operating under IMO Tier II fallback (FB) conditions. Two CPP control strategies were compared: a constant-speed mode, in which engine speed was maintained at approximately 162 rpm and load was controlled by propeller pitch, and a combinator mode, in which engine speed and pitch were jointly controlled. In the combinator mode, the propeller pitch reached saturation (100%) at approximately 25% load, and further load variation was governed primarily by engine speed. The analysis focused on an engine-load range of approximately 25–75% SMCR and evaluated propulsion performance, including specific fuel oil consumption (SFOC) and shaft torque, together with estimated brake-specific exhaust emissions expressed in g/kWh. The combinator mode achieved superior fuel efficiency under partial-load conditions, reducing SFOC by up to 10.5 g/kWh (5.4%) at 25% load, while increasing shaft torque by up to 47%, indicating improved engine–propeller matching. However, this benefit was accompanied by higher estimated emissions at low load, with BSNOx increasing from 13.61 to 16.95 g/kWh. As engine load increased, differences in both performance and emissions between the two modes diminished. These results reveal a clear load-dependent trade-off between fuel efficiency and exhaust emissions in CPP operation and emphasize the importance of load-based switching or optimal joint control strategies under off-design conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jaesung Moon (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1c22267fb587c655e57chttps://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14040331
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper