PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026European Journal of Neurology0 citationsOpen Access

Prevalence and Patterns of Cranial Nerve Involvement in CIDP , Autoimmune Nodopathy, MMN , and Anti‐ MAG Neuropathy: A Multicenter Korea/ UK Study of 582 Patients

View Full Paper
YMYoung Gi MinELEun-Jae LeeHHHee Jo Han

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand the prevalence and patterns of cranial nerve involvement in various chronic autoimmune neuropathies.
  • Retrospective analysis of 582 patients with autoimmune neuropathies from 5 centers in Korea and the UK.
  • Patients with cranial nerve involvement were identified and categorized.
  • Comparison made between CIDP patients with and without cranial nerve involvement.
  • Cranial nerve involvement observed in 8.8% of CIDP and 24.2% of autoimmune nodopathy patients; absent in MMN and anti-MAG neuropathy.
  • Facial palsy was the most common manifestation, seen in 45% of CIDP and 50% of AN patients.
  • Cranial+ CIDP patients were generally younger and showed greater improvement despite higher initial disability.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Cranial nerve involvement is a well‐recognized feature in Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) but remains less well understood in chronic forms of autoimmune neuropathies. Earlier studies of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) were conducted before updated diagnostic criteria and the recognition of autoimmune nodopathy (AN), which may limit the interpretation of their findings. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 582 patients with chronic autoimmune neuropathies—CIDP ( n = 431), multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) ( n = 64), anti‐myelin‐associated glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy ( n = 54), and AN ( n = 33)—from 4 Korean and 1 UK centers. Patients with cranial nerve involvement were identified and described. CIDP patients with cranial nerve involvement (cranial+ CIDP) were compared with those without (cranial− CIDP). Results Cranial nerve involvement was observed in 8.8% (38/431) of CIDP and 24.2% (8/33) of AN patients but was absent in MMN (0/64) and anti‐MAG neuropathy (0/54). Facial palsy was overall the most common manifestation (CIDP: 45%, AN: 50%). Patients with AN more frequently exhibited bilateral optic neuropathy (50%) and facial diplegia (38%), while CIDP patients more often showed trigeminal neuropathy and oculomotor nerve palsy (both 32%). Compared with cranial− CIDP, cranial+ CIDP patients were more often younger, of variant subtypes (especially multifocal), presented (sub)acutely with preceding infection/vaccination, followed by relapsing–remitting rather than progressive courses, and achieved greater improvement despite greater pre‐treatment disability. Conclusions Cranial nerve involvement serves as a diagnostic clue in chronic autoimmune neuropathies, particularly in identifying AN and CIDP. Cranial+ CIDP appears to represent a distinct subset with partial overlap to GBS, suggesting unique underlying mechanisms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Min et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1c22267fb587c655e5f5https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.70512
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper